
Quote: Originally Posted by
ignatzatsonic
Have you yet been able to use your preferred backup method on Windows 7?
I can do a backup / format / restore, but its' not really working, Win 7 will boot, but it's not fully restored. I'm not sure of all the issues I'll be running into. Junction points (reparse points) are one issue, since Win 7 creates a few of these (XP doesn't have any unless you or an application you run creates these). I'm not sure about the digital certificates either. Win 7 is new to me. Currently I'm using an image backup for the actual backup. The backup / format / restore via file / folder is just experimental at this point for Win 7 (it does work for XP).

Quote: Originally Posted by
ignatzatsonic
If you have not yet been able to use your preferred method, how is it that you know your method "speeds up the system", as you say, on Windows 7?
In the case of Windows XP, it speeds up loading tmes somewhat, but the main speed improvement, is backup and verify time after having done a backup / format / restore. (Note I do a verify with windiff after backups and restores).
As mentioned a defrag / sequentialize app would accomplish the same thing, and I would stick with the image backup for Windows 7.
Currently my primary system is still XP, on a system that is now triple boot, XP 32 bit, XP 64 bit, Win 7 64 bit, each on a separate hard drive and partition. Currently I'm just experimenting with Windows 7.
This is a system I recently bought that uses an Intel DP67BG motherboard, and in about 4 years when it's time to replace this system, I may not be able to find a motherboard that still offers Win XP drivers.
The sequentialization of files follows traditional backup applications ordering (I used to work on these for a tape drive company). An example ordering:
directory1\file1
directory1\file2
directory1\file3
directory1\subdir1\file4
directory1\subdir1\file5
directory1\subdir1\file6
directory1\subdir2\file7
directory1\subdir2\file8
directory1\subdir2\file9
directory4\...
The point is to keep all files in each directory in adjacent clusters on a disk, so all files in directory1 are adjancent, all fiels in subdir1 are adjacent, ... . This speeds up load times but I haven't really benchmarked this. If doing a file / folder backup or verify with sequentialized files (in the same ordering as the backup app), the I/O is essentially sequential, so it's almost as fast an image backup.
If what I'm looking for doesn't exist, then I'll stick with image backup for the OS partition. I install almost all applications on a separate partition, and assuming this doesn't create more parse points or certificates on the separate partition, I can use the file / folder backup utitlity I use now. I keep data in yet another partition. Keeping OS, apps and data in separate partitions reduces restore time if there's an issue, since genreally only one partition wil need to be restored.