System Image same as Cloned drive?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 1
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #1

    System Image same as Cloned drive?


    So I have a system image from Windows Backup and Restore. Is it the same thing as a Cloned drive? If not, what differences are there?
      My Computer


  2. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #2

    If you restored your image to say a brand new HDD of the same or greater size you would end up with a fully functional system (OS, programs, data etc) just like if you cloned. Cloning is just a bit by bit/ sector by sector copy. Cloning would copy everything which you don't really need like pagefile contents etc.

    Using imaging you need no preparation of the new HDD just physically connect it (by itself) and run the image restore process. Dead easy.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 1,379
    Win7 Pro 32-bit, Win8 Pro 32-bit
       #3

    Other differences ...

    System images are typically compressed to save space. So, if you have a 70GB partition, with not much in it, the image itself might only take up 30GB or less. A cloned drive is an exact copy of the drive -- so it requires the same space as the drive.

    Image backups in Win7 typically only back up the "boot" partition and the OS partition. If you have other partitions on the drive (e.g., a shared data partition), that would not automatically be included in the backup. With a drive clone, you get ALL the partitions on the drive -- since it is a complete copy.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 12,012
    Windows 7 Home Premium SP1, 64-bit
       #4

    dougb73 said:
    So I have a system image from Windows Backup and Restore. Is it the same thing as a Cloned drive? If not, what differences are there?
    Images are a backup---a way of recovering a system from a disaster. They can also be used to simply move to another hard drive when there has been no disaster. Images are stored on another drive for later use (restoration)

    Clones are not a backup. A clone is a transfer of the system to another drive when all is going well---typically to move to a new hard drive. Clones are not something you go to in a disaster. Clones are used in real-time, with nothing stored in anticipation of later use.

    If all is going well, no disasters, and you simply want to move to another drive, either imaging or cloning may work----or fail. Most here use images for that purpose---or a clean install.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 179
    Windows 7 Home Prem 32 bit
       #5

    ignatzatsonic said:
    dougb73 said:
    So I have a system image from Windows Backup and Restore. Is it the same thing as a Cloned drive? If not, what differences are there?
    Images are a backup---a way of recovering a system from a disaster. They can also be used to simply move to another hard drive when there has been no disaster. Images are stored on another drive for later use (restoration)

    Clones are not a backup. A clone is a transfer of the system to another drive when all is going well---typically to move to a new hard drive. Clones are not something you go to in a disaster. Clones are used in real-time, with nothing stored in anticipation of later use.

    If all is going well, no disasters, and you simply want to move to another drive, either imaging or cloning may work----or fail. Most here use images for that purpose---or a clean install.
    I recently attempted to CLONE my system drive & all went well, but the SYSTEM RESTORE points were not included. I did the CLONE because I knew a previous IMAGE does not include past or current RESTORE points. Do you know how to get the RESTORE pts included in a CLONE?

    BTW: I used MACRIUM to do the CLONE.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 379
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 OEM
       #6

    A clone has to have your restore points, a clone is a copy of the parent HDD.
    I take an Image of my PC every 2 to 3 weeks or when ever I need to load software or play with volatile subjects.
    So for this reason I turn Restore Off.
    My images are my restore, why waste time copying restore data.
      My Computer


  7. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #7

    MeOnMine said:
    So for this reason I turn Restore Off.
    I have restore off all the time but it shouldn't matter anyway - should it when it comes to system imaging?
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #8

    MeOnMine said:
    A clone has to have your restore points, a clone is a copy of the parent HDD.
    I take an Image of my PC every 2 to 3 weeks or when ever I need to load software or play with volatile subjects.
    So for this reason I turn Restore Off.
    My images are my restore, why waste time copying restore data.
    Pretty much the same here. I never could get System Restore to work in Win 7 so I turned it off and use images made with Macrium Reflect. I only make images of my boot drive (OS and Programs).
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 20,583
    Win-7-Pro64bit 7-H-Prem-64bit
       #9

    Hi,
    Yep system protection is usually useless it has never completely restored windows mostly all system restore does is confuse windows causing other problems.

    As long as you do system images regularly they are your backups indeed why waste the disk space on something that is so bad at restoring a system :)
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #10

    It's easier to understand the difference between imaging and cloning if one uses a photography analogy. an image is like a photo negative. Same as a photo negative is used to make a print, an image is used to create a duplicate of the original. If making a copy of a drive using imaging, one first has to make an image onto another drive, then use that image to reproduce the first drive onto a third drive or the original drive. One advantage of images is they are normally compressed, meaning they take up less room on a storage drive, allowing one to store several off them.

    Cloning is more like a photo copier. It makes an exact copy of a drive onto another drive without the use of an image. The advantages of cloning for making a duplicate drive are it is faster and it eliminates the need for the extra drive. Cloning can be used for backups but it is extremely inefficient most of the time. Imaging is better for making backups.

    Imaging is best suited for backing up only boot drives or partitions (OS and Programs only). Imaging and cloning are not practical for backing up data. A folder/file syncing program (I like FreeFileSync) is much more efficient and faster for backing up data and will give you a duplicate drive with your data on it.

    Imaging is best for backing up drives. Cloning is best for duplicating a drive.
    Last edited by Lady Fitzgerald; 15 May 2016 at 17:02. Reason: No, I wasn't drunk when I wrote the last two sentences; just tired
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:18.
Find Us