Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

IE9-64bit is NOT running the same engine as IE9-32bit and it shows.

MS put their resources into the 32bit IE and just token effort into 64-bit.

IE9-32bit



IE9-64bit


UPDATED TO INCLUDE FF 3 and 4

FF 3.6.15


FF 4.0



Jim

I ran FF vs Chrome on my local webserver, a very old rig running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
The hardware is top notch, Intel P4 2.80GHz w/ a blazing gig of RAM.
Well, I only use it for testing purposes so it's sufficient.

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

So here's the shameful facts for FF:



And here's Chrome in all its glory:

sordid said:

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

There was a time when I thought that FF's low Peacemaker Benchmarks were a horrible indictment against the browser, but after I started actually using it I found that it functioned quite well even compared to Opera which is my primary browser and is known to post Peacekeeper Benchmarks over 20,000. Evidently not all Benchmark results translate fully and directly into improved functionality on the internet.

~Maxx~

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

imeem said:

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

MS put their resources in the 32bit version and just a token effort in the 64-bit. The 64-bit uses the old engine from IE8 while the 32bit got an updated engine.

Jim

bleah! yuck!, etc. A zero on complex graphics.