New
#21
I don't think people should have to run these programs to keep firefox fast. I am a firefox user that won't switch, but have little reason to belive that firefox should be that slow to start up.
I don't think people should have to run these programs to keep firefox fast. I am a firefox user that won't switch, but have little reason to belive that firefox should be that slow to start up.
I am not the only one (looks to Steve...you know who you are) but...Firefox 3.7A1 is less buggier...faster...and using addons (with the help of the nightly tester tools) I have never had a better experience...
Unless something miraculous happens with 3.6 FINAL...I am skipping it
From today's Firefox/Delivery Meeting, the following information about the forthcoming release of FF 3.6:
- QA is working on full functional tests, going well
- one potential RC respin candidate bug has been found, evaluating
- still working on an exact ship date, two proposed dates are Jan 19 and Jan 26
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Del...ngs/2010-01-13
^Thanks for the feedback patio; I might give it a try :)
I'm using FF 3.6 RC1 right now.. Passed the browser benchmark test with a score almost 3x higher than IE8 and 50% higher than 3.5.7
I've been a Firefox user for one reason; Adblock Plus. If Adblock Plus was available, updated, and as functional on Chrome, I'd switch in a heartbeat.
amen to that. The ads are ridiculous on some sites. It ought to be a felony to send anything to someone's computer without their permission