
Quote: Originally Posted by
ionbasa
So an Intel quad core w/ hyper threading can out perform an x6 AMD?
Depending upon what you are doing, yes it can. More cores doesn't necessarily mean more performance. most depends upon the application and how well they utilize additional processors.

Quote: Originally Posted by
ionbasa
First of all the i7-950 has 2 less cores, and is clocked at 3.06 GHz. It also seems it has a locked mutiplier, while the AMD x6 is clocked at 3.33 Ghz. So how can the Intel CPU be better?
Well, first off. Clock speed between two different processor architectures is irrelevant. The only time you can be sure that the CPU is faster, is if you compare the same chips, but at different speeds. For example, the Intel Q9550 versus the Q9650.
Think of it like this, lets say that you have 2 vehicles and the first can go exactly 80mph and the second can go exactly 100mph. So, if you are at home depot and buying all of the materials to build a shed and wanted to get the parts home as fast as possible....you would go with the 100mph vehicle, right? Well, what if the first vehicle was a pickup truck and could handle everything in 1 load...but the second vehicle was a hatchback and would require 3 trips, back and forth. Now, the faster of the vehicles isn't the fastest at a particular task.

Quote: Originally Posted by
ionbasa
Also the Intel CPU costs $285 on newegg. From this standpoint it seems that the AMD CPU has the better price/performance ratio.
Ok, it's possible the Intel costs $20 more right now. I've seen it down in the $265 range in the past. Of course, the Intel consumes less power and gives off less heat from what I have read....so that too could be a consideration.