48÷2(9+3) = ?

View Poll Results: Which answer do you prefer?

Voters
60. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2

    35 58.33%
  • 288

    25 41.67%
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #1

    48÷2(9+3) = ?


    48÷2(9+3) = ?

    Two answers: 2 or 288

    I first saw this on another forum and then subsequently on others. The amount of threads arguing which answer is the correct one is hilarious.

    So where does SF stand?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #2

    i got stuck at the 2(9+3) stage

    do you mean 2 * (9+3)?
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 927
    windows 7 ultimate
       #3

    I'd go for what feels like my age this morning, but the correct answer is 2. Either side of the division (÷) symbol are separate entities.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 5,056
    Windows 7 x64 pro/ Windows 7 x86 Pro/ XP SP3 x86
       #4

    2.

    For the answer to be 288, the problem should have been (48÷2)(9+3)
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 1,794
    MS Windows 8
       #5

    sol'n

    =48÷2(9+3)

    =48÷2(12)

    =48÷24

    =2 :)
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 521
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Service Pack 1
       #6

    rbeldua said:
    sol'n

    =48÷2(9+3)

    =48÷2(12)

    =48÷24

    =2 :)
    Agreed. I've also voted.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #7

    Bill2 said:
    2.

    For the answer to be 288, the problem should have been (48÷2)(9+3)
    i protest!

    (48÷2)(9+3) is not valid syntax for arithmetic! - at least it wasn't when they were trying to educate me.

    in algebra, with the numbers replaced by letters, it may work..but not in arithmetic...that's why we have the multiplication sign.

    sorry to spoil your fun, but there it is.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 2,009
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86
       #8

    mickey megabyte said:

    i protest!

    (48÷2)(9+3) is not valid syntax for arithmetic! - at least it wasn't when they were trying to educate me.4
    I don't see anything wrong with Bill's Syntax.
    I learned that operations with Brackets (or are those parentheses?) are assumed Multiplications unless specified otherwise.
    Letters in Algebra are only substitutes/placeholders for numbers, so it wouldn't make any sense at all to apply a different set of rules here
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 1,794
    MS Windows 8
       #9

    mickey megabyte said:
    Bill2 said:
    2.

    For the answer to be 288, the problem should have been (48÷2)(9+3)
    i protest!

    (48÷2)(9+3) is not valid syntax for arithmetic! - at least it wasn't when they were trying to educate me.

    in algebra, with the numbers replaced by letters, it may work..but not in arithmetic...that's why we have the multiplication sign.

    sorry to spoil your fun, but there it is.

    parenthesis is also a sign of multiplication so does an asterisk, but mostly in algebra parenthesis is used to replace the multiplication sign x so not to misunderstood x which is the unknown, 2x + 2x(x+1) find x, as for 2x1=2

    in this case (48÷2)(9+3) involving more than one operation, a parenthesis is used which means 48÷2=24 and then 9+3=12...final operation is to multiply 24 and 12 which is 288
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 5,056
    Windows 7 x64 pro/ Windows 7 x86 Pro/ XP SP3 x86
       #10

    He he Micky, you went to school a loooong time ago.

    Ok, suppose we solve like this.

    48÷2(9+3)
    = 48÷2(12)

    Now, as per BODMAS, the division operator takes precedence over the (implied) multiplication operator so:

    =24(12)
    =288.

    Can I vote again?
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52.
Find Us