Windows 7 File Count

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  1. Posts : 1,289
    Thread Starter
       #11

    Zidane24 said:
    lmao they may have changed some things between 7077 and 7100 but the evidence is pretty clear that 7100 was just 7077 re-branded...just something interesting I saw from this list
    Im interested in finding out what files/features where cut from RTM..

    I believe the gap between 7077 and 7100 was possibly just bug fixes before the RC release instead of adding/removing features like the other builds?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 5,807
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64 - Mac OS X 10.6.4 x64
       #12

    dmex said:
    Im interested in finding out what files/features where cut from RTM..

    I believe the gap between 7077 and 7100 was possibly just bug fixes before the RC release instead of adding/removing features like the other builds?
    I want to know why 7264 had so many files over other builds...including other RTM-Candidates...
      My Computer


  3. DJG
    Posts : 1,008
    Windows 7 RTM x64
       #13

    Zidane24 said:
    I want to know why 7264 had so many files over other builds...including other RTM-Candidates...
    Wasn't that the one with the alleged showstopper warning?

    Also, we have two counts for 7600.16385. First I thought, there's one with the EI.CFG and one without, which would account for the filecount diff, but there's also a folder diff of one.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,112
    XP_Pro, W7_7201, W7RC.vhd, SciLinux5.3, Fedora12, Fedora9_2x, OpenSolaris_09-06
       #14

    DJG said:
    Wasn't that the one with the alleged showstopper warning?

    Also, we have two counts for 7600.16385. First I thought, there's one with the EI.CFG and one without, which would account for the filecount diff, but there's also a folder diff of one.
    Build 7600.16385 x86: 875 files, 200 folders

    Build 7600.16385 x64: 874 Files, 199 Folders
    That's strange...

    I thought I'd have a look-see for the folders discrepancy and all of my indications
    are that the x64 version has one MORE folder (.\efi\) than the x86, looking only at the Zuko Retail_Ultimate iso.

    Also, the x86 has a 'Starter.clg' that's not in the x64.
    I guess third-world countries won't be getting the x64 cpus, therefore no 'Starter' for them.
    --------------------------------------------------

    Curious, I checked the -WZT versions:

    These show the same results as the 'Zuko' listed above:
    x64 has 1 more folder, and
    x86 has file 'Starter.clg', not in x64.

    FWIW, the WZT checks indicate that both versions have .\sources\ei.cfg,
    so I assume the Zuko does too, because the respective isos are identical.

    (These are the "official-WZT", not the "dirty-one" that has a missing ei.cfg.)

    This just makes me question the numbers posted above, undergoing 'analysis'.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Note: All of these isos were labeled "official MS RTM" or something like that....
    (I don't know if the 'torrent arena/community' pays any attention to that kind of stuff -- I'm 100% new here.)
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:41.
Find Us