New
#641
erm, not quite sure what point you're trying to make (if any).
I'll try and elaborate.
No coal: what would have powered our coal-fired power stations and our home fires? Wood probably, so how would we have kept up with the tree planting needed constantly?
No oil: without oil there probably wouldn't be a car industry, no airline industry, no heavy engineering, no world wars, in fact we'd probably still be living in small communities that never travelled further than a few miles.
As I said, it was just a thought. Perhaps I should have kept it to myself. :)
i don't think edison was slagging off fossil fuels per se, but merely suggesting that cleaner and renewable sources are preferable.
what's wrong with that?
I wasn't suggesting that there was anything wrong with it at all, in fact his suggestion is preferable.
I was just trying to imagine how things would be today had fossil fuels not been diiscovered.
Enlightening me more.THE PARADOX OF OUR AGE
We have bigger houses but smaller families;
more conveniences, but less time;
We have more degrees, but less sense;
more knowledge, but less judgement;
more experts, but more problems;
more medicines, but less healthiness;
We've been all the way to the moon and back,
but have trouble crossing the street to meet
the new neighbor.
We build more computers to hold more
information to produce more copies then ever,
but have less communication;
We have become long on quantity,
but short on quality.
These are times of fast foods
but slow digestion;
Tall men but short character;
Steep profits but shallow relationships.
It's a time when there is much in the window,
but nothing in the room.
The 14th Dalai Lama
{Ken & Jan}
Thanks, Jan
Kevin
You know I say just what I think, and nothing more and less. I cannot say one thing and mean another.
~Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
A Guy