Why isn't Fusion energy a world priority

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
       #1

    Why isn't Fusion energy a world priority


    If "we" are serious about relatively clean affordable energy why aren't we spending giga$ on serious contained fusion power plants?

    It's a gigantic scientific and engineering challenge - so what.

    Is humanity being given short shrift by vested interests in fossil fuels and fission reactors.
      My Computer


  2. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #2

    In Germany they had an experimental fusion reactor in Kalkar. It was operational (for research) for at least 10 years. Then they closed it and disamtled it for Billions. But I do not recall why.

    The German plant was converted into a theme park: http://inhabitat.com/dismantled-german-nuclear-plant-transformed-into-incredible-wunderland-kalkar-amusement-park/nuclear-powerplant-transformed-wunderland6/
      My Computer


  3. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
    Thread Starter
       #3

    Very sad Wolfgang and I would suggest the dirty $ got in the way.
    I think Europe could be the leading light here. I know they still plug away.
    Facilities like CERN show the commitment to nuclear science but more is needed.

    The obvious to me: The sun is a fusion reactor and "clean". Earth based fusion reactors could also be "clean" but more controllable to meet needs.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 19,383
    Windows 10 Pro x64 ; Xubuntu x64
       #4

    Vested interests - thats the answer right there. Too many people stand to lose too much money....
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 6,349
    Windows7 Pro 64bit SP-1; Windows XP Pro 32bit
       #5

    Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    There are two places working on it.
    Right now it appears it takes more enrgy in production than is produced.
      My Computer


  6. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
    Thread Starter
       #6

    That's true Hopalong but that just means the scientific and engineering challenges need much more work. Fission is relatively easy - Contained fussion is not. This should be the challenge of the century - people can do it and should demand it.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 6,349
    Windows7 Pro 64bit SP-1; Windows XP Pro 32bit
       #7

    I agree.

    I just thought a link to further info would be good.
    I had to read it first.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 7,730
    Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-Bit
       #8

    As ever, money, vested interests and politics dictate which way our future energy needs are met.

    Nuclear fusion has been achieved here on Earth, but only for an extremely short time and at huge cost.

    As for fossil fuels, the sooner we're less dependent on oil, the sooner the mess that is the Middle East will be resolved.
      My Computer


  9. mjf
    Posts : 5,969
    Windows 7x64 Home Premium SP1
    Thread Starter
       #9

    Development of the science and technology to produce a viable fusion reactor would be the pinnacle of human achievement.

    I would love to start my career again and be part of this. The basic science, maths and hard core engineering is becoming less popular. What hope do we have. (Never mind multicore CPUs as we starve to death).
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 8,476
    Windows® 8 Pro (64-bit)
       #10

    Isn't this what Iran is doing by their Uranium Enrichment plant?
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35.
Find Us