Windows 7 Forums


Windows 7: "Smart" Alloy Will Make Your Air Conditioner 175% More Efficient

20 Jul 2010  
Lordbob75

Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Mint 9
7,123 posts
In the Crust
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by clunkfish View Post
Quote:
No you are right in the second one. Assuming AC is about 40% efficient, then it is essentially (40+(40*.75) and becomes 70% efficient. It may not be a BIG increase, but if every AC unit in Arizona used this, we would save a ton of money and landfill space.
No, that's a 75% increase. A 175% increase from 40%, using Method 2 () gives:

(40+(40*1.75))=110% efficiency

- so we are still in the realms of perpetual motion machines. If they really can do this, buy stock right now
No, thats wrong.

It is 175% MORE efficient than it already is, which means 1.75 more efficient... That makes it 70%.



~Lordbob
My System SpecsSystem Spec

20 Jul 2010  
clunkfish

Windows 7 Enterprise x64
283 posts
North Somerset, UK
 
 

If I earn £40 per hour and get a 175% increase, I will now earn £110 per hour. If my increase is to £70 per hour, that's only a 75% rise.

It's always clearer when you put it in financial terms
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
jebuchanan

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 (Retail)
217 posts
Dartmouth, N.S., Canada
 
 

That 70% is still a product of the initial number.
175% (MORE) efficient, initial efficiency suggestion was 40%, = 40 (100%) + 30 (75%) = 70%
70% + 40% (the original number - the percentages are additive) = 110%.

Seeing as how one cannot generate more than is put into a system (power in = power out), the above numbers just do not work.
I would venture to say this system (may) improve efficience by a given amount, but any real numbers have yet to be determined/realized.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.


20 Jul 2010  
Thorsen

Win7 Home Premium 64x
3,386 posts
 
 

40%= 4/10= 0.4
175% = 175/100 = 1.75

.4 * 1.75 = 0.7 = 70%
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
Thorsen

Win7 Home Premium 64x
3,386 posts
 
 

another example.

Bob works at a job at 40% capacity.
Sue works twice as hard (200%)
sue works at 80% capacity

.4 * 2.0 = .80 or 80%
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
fseal

Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
2,557 posts
San Diego
 
 

I would bet that it's 99% probable that the phrase "more efficient" was incorrectly used in the original source. Actual grammar is completely non-existant in most news sources these days.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
clunkfish

Windows 7 Enterprise x64
283 posts
North Somerset, UK
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Thorsen View Post
40%= 4/10= 0.4
175% = 175/100 = 1.75

.4 * 1.75 = 0.7 = 70%
By your analysis, a 100% increase would be worthless:

40%= 4/10= 0.4
100% = 100/100 = 1.00
.4 * 1.00 = 0.4 = 40%

So a 100% increase from 40% would be...still 40%. This is clearly wrong.

What's more, a 50% increase by this method would mean a decrease:

40%= 4/10= 0.4
50% = 50/100 = 0.5
.4 * 0.5 = 0.2 = 20%

We started with 40%, increased it by half, and ended up with... only 20%. This is even more clearly wrong.

A 25% increase from 40% is 50%; a 50% increase from 40% is 60%; a 100% increase from 40% is 80%; and a 175% increase from 40% is 110%. So either standard air conditioners generally work at rather low efficiencies and the new system is going to improve them by an absolutely astonishing amount, or this "175% increase" they quote is a mistake. My money is on option 2
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
jebuchanan

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 (Retail)
217 posts
Dartmouth, N.S., Canada
 
 



I would agree with option 2 also.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
Lordbob75

Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Mint 9
7,123 posts
In the Crust
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by clunkfish View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Thorsen View Post
40%= 4/10= 0.4
175% = 175/100 = 1.75

.4 * 1.75 = 0.7 = 70%
By your analysis, a 100% increase would be worthless:

40%= 4/10= 0.4
100% = 100/100 = 1.00
.4 * 1.00 = 0.4 = 40%

So a 100% increase from 40% would be...still 40%. This is clearly wrong.

What's more, a 50% increase by this method would mean a decrease:

40%= 4/10= 0.4
50% = 50/100 = 0.5
.4 * 0.5 = 0.2 = 20%

We started with 40%, increased it by half, and ended up with... only 20%. This is even more clearly wrong.

A 25% increase from 40% is 50%; a 50% increase from 40% is 60%; a 100% increase from 40% is 80%; and a 175% increase from 40% is 110%. So either standard air conditioners generally work at rather low efficiencies and the new system is going to improve them by an absolutely astonishing amount, or this "175% increase" they quote is a mistake. My money is on option 2
No, you are still wrong.

50% is 1/2 correct?
So 1/2 of 50% is 25%.
175% is 7/4, so 7/4 of 50% is 87.5%

~Lordbob
My System SpecsSystem Spec
20 Jul 2010  
jebuchanan

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 (Retail)
217 posts
Dartmouth, N.S., Canada
 
 

You're missing the big point: This is on top of the original figure (added to).

so 175% more than 40% is 110%

let's work with actual numbers, shall we?

say (as in previous example) 100% is 100 units.
40% of this is 40 units.
still with me?

we increase the 40 units by 175% (175% of the 40 units).
first off, what are we doing?
we are adding an additional 175% of these 40 units to this amount.
40 * 1.75 (we all agree here 1.75 = 175%) = 70 (can be checked with a calculator for those who are slower)
this is the amount we are adding to the original 40 units.
so:
original units + 175% of those units = new total units
40 + 70 = 110 units now total.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 "Smart" Alloy Will Make Your Air Conditioner 175% More Efficient problems?



Thread Tools



Similar help and support threads for: "Smart" Alloy Will Make Your Air Conditioner 175% More Efficient
Thread Forum
Removing "SMART Repair" Data Recovery Spyware System Security
How do I turn off "Smart Text Selection" in Internet Explorer 9 Browsers & Mail
Solved Samsung Smart Panel stating "Printer status not available" Hardware & Devices
Media Center "smart file location" Media Center


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.



Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd