Hey guys if you look at my current system spec i have 1 6950
but for running bf3 cleaning i want to have it ad hd with 1080p
so i was thinking about getting another 6950 will it help get the fps up to around 60 ?
or shall i up the ram?
cheers
I'm unsure if you would have to do either thing. I don't know my exact FPS, but on a Q9550 with 8GB of RAM and a single Nvidia 570GTX, I was running full screen 1920x1080 with everything at high and it was super smooth.
It will play yes. and at your resolution, but what level of detail (low-ultra ect) its impossible to say until you get the game.
Its a very cpu intensive game so youve got a quad core which will help alot.
try Can You Run It? and then see what you have to update
Hmm i dont know, but i seriously think there something wrong with my desktop, i doubt its running at its full potiential. I cant max out the graphics (Ultra High) without any lagg... and my computer is consider to be pretty powerful (not trying to bragg) but here's my spec
OP: Window 7 Home Premium
Memory: 6GB ram (1333mhz)
CPU: Intel i7 920 2.67 ghz (I overclocked it to 3.8 ghz to try to max out battlefield 3 graphics)
GPU: Dual Ati Radeons 5970s
Hardrive: 1.15 TB
like i said, i overclocked my i7 920 processor to 3.8 ghz and enabled crossfire on my 5970's, it ran pretty good on High settings (a few minor lagg spike, but for the most part it ran smooth), but when i put the setting to Ultra High, i was lagg spiking everywhere, it was really laggy and choppy, at one point it would run smooth, then it would go crazy... How are you guys currently doing?
Mine was set to "auto" and had put a few things at Ultra and the rest at high. It played fine on my box (Q9550 CPU, 8GB RAM, single Nvidia GTX570 video card. I backed my settings down to High just to ensure smooth play, and I didn't notice much change. I'm thinking the actual noticeable difference between High and Ultra won't be hardly noticeable at all. If you are playing great at High, I'd be content.
Quote