New
#11
Yes Gary, here is a quote from the BF blog
Bringing the best of multiplayer into single player
Battlefield 4 is a seminal moment for the series and for us at DICE. We have long been known for our award-winning multiplayer. This time around, we are bringing the best elements of our multiplayer into the single player campaign.
This means that gamers will experience huge environments, a playground of destruction, access to an arsenal of vehicles, and the ability to direct squad mates – all within the single player campaign. Battlefield 4 is our most human, dramatic, and believable game yet, powered with our proprietary Frostbite™ 3 engine. This is the engine that will let you own land, sea and air.
Bigger maps are better as are multiple paths. Squad control, not so much.
I feel like I am the only one waiting for Battlefield 2143...
I don't know. I am just tired of all the modern combat games these days. They all feel like the same thing to me. I stopped playing Call of Duty after Black Ops 1 because I just didn't want to spend the money on any more of the same game. I have played Battlefield since 1942 (the game not the year ) and I just don't think I can muster the strength to buy BF4.
I know it's going to have an awesome campaign because BF3, MoH and CoD have always had a great single player but I just don't want to spend $60 on a 6 hour campaign and then get sucked into another online game where they try and milk more money out of me. I am really just looking for something different.
Pretty much this. EA doesn't care much about the singleplayer aspect. They just care that you're spending money on their multiplayer portion of their games. BF2 was kind of the same...it was so freaking stupid that you couldn't "level up" in the singleplayer aspect of the game, no matter how many games you win. That was a huge disappointment, and EA never changed it simply because they don't give a flying f*ck.