So what is this comp's bottleneck?!?!?!?!?!

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 316
    Home Premium x64
       #11

    pparks1 said:
    I don't profess to be a fountain of knowledge when it comes to video cards, but is there really a massive difference between an Nvidia 8800GT and an ATI 4870? The CPU is certainly going to have an impact. And your hard drive would primary cause slower loading times...but I don't think would have a big impact on FPS?
    Here is an article on graphics cards, there should be a noticable difference, especially in higher resolutions, between the Nvidia 8800GT and the ATI 4870.

    Far Cry 2 PC VGA Graphics performance review
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 2,685
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86-64
       #12

    Your CPU is useless. 2.2GHz of slow quad cores is not conducive to gaming. It will not push the GPU which is not being utilized properly.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 795
    windows 7 RTM x64
       #13

    Frostmourne said:
    Your CPU is useless. 2.2GHz of slow quad cores is not conducive to gaming. It will not push the GPU which is not being utilized properly.
    This coming from a guy with a phenom logo as his avitar. I wonder if your computer support faster ram? You are running ddr-800, if the board supports ddr-1066 you would have a large increase in transfer speed of in-ram data to the video card.

    Read the following thread:
    http://www.overclockers.com/forums/s....php?p=5549636
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 2,685
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86-64
       #14

    ccatlett1984 said:
    Frostmourne said:
    Your CPU is useless. 2.2GHz of slow quad cores is not conducive to gaming. It will not push the GPU which is not being utilized properly.
    This coming from a guy with a phenom logo as his avitar. I wonder if your computer support faster ram? You are running ddr-800, if the board supports ddr-1066 you would have a large increase in transfer speed of in-ram data to the video card.

    Read the following thread:
    Bottleknecks Help On Understanding Them - Overclockers Forums
    The laptop processor in my system specs is better than this slow quad-core - games need high clock speed combined with cache and architecture - and 2.2GHz will choke any modern game. As for transfer speed, that will be negligible, quantity counts for RAM, not speed (as much).
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 795
    windows 7 RTM x64
       #15

    I beg to differ on pure hertz being the defining spec. I happen to run close to that setup, and have no lag issues at all. I only play on lan servers, but my fps never drops below 60.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 2,685
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86-64
       #16

    ccatlett1984 said:
    I beg to differ on pure hertz being the defining spec. I happen to run close to that setup, and have no lag issues at all. I only play on lan servers, but my fps never drops below 60.
    Lan is different to Crysis - and I did mention cache+architecture. Clock speed is important along with these two for games. Have you tried Crysis on high at 1920x1080?
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 795
    windows 7 RTM x64
       #17

    Frostmourne said:
    ccatlett1984 said:
    I beg to differ on pure hertz being the defining spec. I happen to run close to that setup, and have no lag issues at all. I only play on lan servers, but my fps never drops below 60.
    Lan is different to Crysis - and I did mention cache+architecture. Clock speed is important along with these two for games. Have you tried Crysis on high at 1920x1080?
    The OP is playing CSS, did you pull Crysis out of a hat? CSS is not a comp killer like crysis. And yes i have tried crysis on high, with my two cards in crossfire i was able to keep ~18fps min, but I know that my hardware isnt up to playing it maxed.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 2,685
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86-64
       #18

    ccatlett1984 said:
    Frostmourne said:
    ccatlett1984 said:
    I beg to differ on pure hertz being the defining spec. I happen to run close to that setup, and have no lag issues at all. I only play on lan servers, but my fps never drops below 60.
    Lan is different to Crysis - and I did mention cache+architecture. Clock speed is important along with these two for games. Have you tried Crysis on high at 1920x1080?
    The OP is playing CSS, did you pull Crysis out of a hat? CSS is not a comp killer like crysis. And yes i have tried crysis on high, with my two cards in crossfire i was able to keep ~18fps min, but I know that my hardware isnt up to playing it maxed.
    End this - not much can play Crysis maxed - and high is the second highest option. I hold that a low clock speed is a bottleneck even on old games like CSS.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 795
    windows 7 RTM x64
       #19

    End what?
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 316
    Home Premium x64
       #20

    I'm going to agree that it's the CPU that is the bottleneck. What is your Front Side Bus set to?

    We have very comparable computers. Here is a picture of my CS:S all settings maxed at 1680x1050 resolution

      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49.
Find Us