 | |
| |
| 11 Dec 2010 | #1 |
| | Usb 3.0 vs esata Quick question! Whats faster! USB 3.0 or ESATA!? Ive go-ogled and cant find a definitive answer.. |
My System Specs | |
| 11 Dec 2010 | #2 |
| | It seems that they are on par with each other based on transfer speed alone, which is at 3 Gbps according to information I found on PCworld. |
| My System Specs |
| 11 Dec 2010 | #3 |
| | Sata II @ 3Gbps and Sata III @ 6Gbps vs USB 3 @ 5Gbps. |
| My System Specs |
| . |
| |
| 11 Dec 2010 | #4 |
| | These are all theoretical numbers. No spinning disk needs those speeds (they operate below 1Mb/sec). It is only good if you have an external SSD - but who can afford that. |
| My System Specs |
| 11 Dec 2010 | #5 |
| | Even then, it is theoretical. They take the highest sustained benchmark numbers. It could have lasted seconds or whatever, no one really knows. Sustainable transfer rates will always be slower than that. It's like the Minimum vs. Recommended Requirements of a game. Min = What it takes to get the game to show a picture and make some movement. Not indicating how much movement. Recommended = Could be playable for some, but that's about it, and usually at lowest to maybe medium settings. And even that depends on the system. It's playable, but not optimal. Just an analogy. |
| My System Specs |
 |
Usb 3.0 vs esata problems?
« Shortcut Properties dialogue box - delete options?
|
Desktop icon automatic placement problem when dropping »
| Thread Tools | |
| Similar help and support threads for: Usb 3.0 vs esata | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| eSATA drive not detected--can CrystalDiskInfo damage an eSATA drive | BSOD Help and Support | |||
| Help with esata | Hardware & Devices | |||
| USB 3.0 vs esata? | Hardware & Devices | |||
 eSATA | Hardware & Devices | |||
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM.
