|11 Dec 2010||#5|
| || |
Even then, it is theoretical. They take the highest sustained benchmark numbers.
It could have lasted seconds or whatever, no one really knows.
Sustainable transfer rates will always be slower than that.
It's like the Minimum vs. Recommended Requirements of a game.
Min = What it takes to get the game to show a picture and make some movement. Not indicating how much movement.
Recommended = Could be playable for some, but that's about it, and usually at lowest to maybe medium settings. And even that depends on the system. It's playable, but not optimal.
Just an analogy.
|My System Specs|
|Similar help and support threads for2: Usb 3.0 vs esata|
|USB 3.0 to esata||Hardware & Devices|
|eSATA drive not detected--can CrystalDiskInfo damage an eSATA drive||BSOD Help and Support|
|Help with esata||Hardware & Devices|
|USB 3.0 vs esata?||Hardware & Devices|
|eSATA||Hardware & Devices|
|eSATA Woe's||Hardware & Devices|
|Our Sites ||Site Links ||About Us ||Find Us |
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.