|  | | |
17 Jun 2009
|
#1 | | |
Convince me ! Hi everyone, and let's not waste any time, I'm an avid & Fanatical Win XP 4 Life dude !
Vista home,pren,ultimate,hack,slash,jedi was all fail.
they gave us a huge RAM sucker with a candy skin and a few pre-available widgets and other obnoxious gadgets separated over a dozen packages.
And now we have a new challenger, Win Seven ! but i'm also specktical.
I'm gonna get a new HP G60t soon (P8900 2.4Ghz,4GO Ram), and the first thing i might do if i'm not tempted to test win 7 is to kill vista for a good ol' clean xp that works with everything and eats only a little ram
So tell me guys, how would this win 7 Beat a 64 Bit XP !? | My System Specs |
| System Manufacturer/Model Number HP G60t OS XP CPU P8600 Intel Core 2 DUO 2.4 Ghz Memory 4 Go SDRAM DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GEFORCE 9200 M GS Sound Card Realteck foolishness Monitor(s) Displays 15'6" Screen Resolution WXGA Hard Drives SATA 320Go 5200 RPM Internet Speed 56k |
17 Jun 2009
|
#2 | | |
DirectX 11. Possibly increased hardware support. More features than XP.
Yes XP takes less RAM and runs faster but sooner or later we have to give up on it. For now, just do a dual boot setup and get the best of both worlds. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Too many to list. OS XP, Seven, 2008R2 CPU AMD, Intel, VIA Motherboard Various Memory Corsair, Kingston, etc. Graphics Card ATI, NVIDIA Monitor(s) Displays Samsung Keyboard qwerty Hard Drives Maxtor, Western Digital Internet Speed 22 Mb/s @ home, 1 Gb/s @ server Other Info All of my systems still run fastest on XP 32-bit for the most part. Win7 is fun to play with, but I still prefer XP for raw speed, security, and functionality. |
17 Jun 2009
|
#3 | | |

Quote: Originally Posted by sup3rsprt DirectX 11. Possibly increased hardware support. More features than XP.
Yes XP takes less RAM and runs faster but sooner or later we have to give up on it. For now, just do a dual boot setup and get the best of both worlds. What is done for drivers at this point ?
i don't think that 7 Can take in Vista ones.
Direct X 11 is definitely a strong point for 7 | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP G60t OS XP CPU P8600 Intel Core 2 DUO 2.4 Ghz Memory 4 Go SDRAM DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GEFORCE 9200 M GS Sound Card Realteck foolishness Monitor(s) Displays 15'6" Screen Resolution WXGA Hard Drives SATA 320Go 5200 RPM Internet Speed 56k |
17 Jun 2009
|
#4 | | |
The display model is now version 1.1 which is supposed to have the capability to enhance performance. Although you can use Vista hardware drivers on Windows 7 if needed. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Too many to list. OS XP, Seven, 2008R2 CPU AMD, Intel, VIA Motherboard Various Memory Corsair, Kingston, etc. Graphics Card ATI, NVIDIA Monitor(s) Displays Samsung Keyboard qwerty Hard Drives Maxtor, Western Digital Internet Speed 22 Mb/s @ home, 1 Gb/s @ server Other Info All of my systems still run fastest on XP 32-bit for the most part. Win7 is fun to play with, but I still prefer XP for raw speed, security, and functionality. |
17 Jun 2009
|
#5 | | |
Windows 95 and 98 are eating very little RAM. If ram is the only problem.
Last edited by herzeleid; 17 Jun 2009 at 05:42 AM..
Reason: typo
| My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 7232b x64 CPU Intel Q8300 @ 2500 Mhz Motherboard Gigabyte EP45-DS3R Memory OCZ 4x2GB DDR2 1066 Mhz Graphics Card Palit 512MB 9800GTX+ Sound Card Realtek HD Monitor(s) Displays Samsung T220 Screen Resolution 1680x1050 PSU OCZ 600SXS Case CoolerMaster Centurion CAC-T05 Cooling Arctic Cooling Fans Hard Drives WD 500GB 32MB, Samsung 200GB 8MB Other Info Epson v500 |
17 Jun 2009
|
#6 | | |

Quote: Originally Posted by sup3rsprt The display model is now version 1.1 which is supposed to have the capability to enhance performance. Although you can use Vista hardware drivers on Windows 7 if needed. I See, are there any benchmark performance comparison on intel cpus? Quote: Windows 95 and 98 are eat very little RAM. If ram is the only problem. yeah but the hardware is not compatible with them | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP G60t OS XP CPU P8600 Intel Core 2 DUO 2.4 Ghz Memory 4 Go SDRAM DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GEFORCE 9200 M GS Sound Card Realteck foolishness Monitor(s) Displays 15'6" Screen Resolution WXGA Hard Drives SATA 320Go 5200 RPM Internet Speed 56k |
17 Jun 2009
|
#7 | | Windows 7 Professional x64 (Build 7600) Frankfurt |
Hey!
I also skipped Vista. I use Vista at work... and i would never use it at home... its just that i dislike Vista... everything does not feel smooth... i would even say it feels slow somehow... it uses a lot of hardware ressource...
I was a huge XP fan ... but since testing Windows 7 i am a Windows 7 Fan
Some pro arguments:
- The GUI looks a lot better then XP but reacts at least as fast/smooth as XP
- Allready good driver support
- DirectX 11
- You don t need a high rig
- A lot of features you never thought of in XP
- Short boot time
- better multi core support then XP
I still have XP in my boot options but since the RC i dunno when i booted it the last time! I think you would really like it!
Ah BTW i allready made some Benchmarks with the BETA (build 7000) against XP.... and allready the BETA was as fast as XP with my RIG! | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Professional x64 (Build 7600) CPU E7300 @ 3,66Ghz Motherboard Gigabyte P35-DS3 Memory 4GB OCZ Reaper HPC Edition 2x2GB DDR2-1066 @1080Mhz 5-5-5-15 Graphics Card ZOTAC GeForce GTX 260 AMP˛! Edition Sound Card Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music Monitor(s) Displays Samsung 226BW (22") / Samsung LE-40F86BD (40") Screen Resolution 1680 x 1050 / 1920 x 1080 Keyboard Cherry eVolution Stream Mouse Razer DeathAdder Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7 Internet Speed 16mbit |
17 Jun 2009
|
#8 | | |
XP is much more stable (and secure) than 95 or 98 because it is based on NT technology.
I have not seen any benchmarks with the new display driver model. There is not much (if anything) currently making use of it in the real world. I suppose only time will tell. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Too many to list. OS XP, Seven, 2008R2 CPU AMD, Intel, VIA Motherboard Various Memory Corsair, Kingston, etc. Graphics Card ATI, NVIDIA Monitor(s) Displays Samsung Keyboard qwerty Hard Drives Maxtor, Western Digital Internet Speed 22 Mb/s @ home, 1 Gb/s @ server Other Info All of my systems still run fastest on XP 32-bit for the most part. Win7 is fun to play with, but I still prefer XP for raw speed, security, and functionality. |
17 Jun 2009
|
#9 | | Windows 7 Ultimate x64. Ellesmere Port, UK. |
Xp only "eats a little ram" because there is very little going on with it. The gui is bland and lifeless to say the least. Not only that but it is nearly a decade old and was around when processors were still aiming for a Ghz. Fast forward to 2009 and you have hardware that is made for the likes of vista and seven. I can live with the fact windows 7 takes up more ram than xp because it stands to reason that it should do with all that is going on.
Xp is dying a long drawn out death(hope I don't go the same way) and sooner or later it will pop it's clogs.
Imo windows seven is 10x the os xp will ever be even in the beta/rc stage of it's life. Xp had just as many teething problems as vista when it was born(although I never had any issues with vista myself).
I have been running windows 7 since November last year as my only os and I would NEVER entertain the thought of going back to xp. When you consider there is 2/3 times as much going on in seven as there is in xp it really amazes.
A thousand people can all tell you different things about it but until you take it for a spin yourself you will never know.
Win 7 kills xp in all it does!! | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Custom Build. OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64. CPU i5 760 @ 4.2Ghz. 1.18v Motherboard Gigabyte - H55M-USB3 Memory 4g Corsair xms3 ddr3, 1600Mhz. Graphics Card Gigabyte GTX-560Ti soc edition Sound Card Asus Xonar Dx - Logitech Z5500. Monitor(s) Displays Acer 22" LCD Wide screen 1680-1050 -Samsung 42" Plasma.... Screen Resolution 1680/1050 -----1920/1080p. Keyboard Logitech G15-v2 Gaming. Mouse Microsoft Sidewinder X8. PSU XigmaTek 80plus NRP-PC702 - 700w dual 30a. Case Venus Gamers Midi Tower Case with LED Display Cooling Arctic Freezer 7 Pro Rev 2... x2 Arctic F8 case fans........ Hard Drives 2x 2TB Seagate Go Flex,
1x 1TB Seagate,
1x 640WD Black,
x16 Gig sandisc flash drive,
1x8Gig sandisc flash drive. Internet Speed Virgin Media - 50mb down- 8mb up. Other Info x2 Xbox 360 wireless controllers...
Dual layer optical disc drive...
Chrome 79million
A.V = MSE |
17 Jun 2009
|
#10 | | Windows 7 Professional 64-bit |

Quote: Originally Posted by rehael What is done for drivers at this point ?
i don't think that 7 Can take in Vista ones.
Direct X 11 is definitely a strong point for 7 Windows 7 can accept Vista drivers, using some myself. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number self built OS Windows 7 Professional 64-bit CPU Intel E8400 3GHz Motherboard Intel DX48BT2 Memory Kingston PC3-10700H 4Gb Graphics Card XFX Radeon HD 5850 BlackEd. Sound Card Asus Xonar DG Monitor(s) Displays 2x Samsung SM-T220HD 22" Screen Resolution 1680x1050 on two monitors Keyboard Microsoft Comfort Curve USB Mouse Razer Diamondback 3G PSU Thermaltake ToughPower 850w Case Thermaltake Armor Cooling Scythe Mugen II Hard Drives OCZ Vertex 2 120gb 3.5" (OS)
Seagate Momentus XT 500gb
Samsung F3 1Tb (games)
2x Samsung F1 1Tb Internet Speed 8128/443 All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM. | |