People who are the only user of a laptop, like me, do not need to password protect it, so its Valid that I think its a pain and so do others I have set up the computer for them.
That is a bad computing habit that people should know very well by now not to follow. I've had to clean many systems infected by malware that assigns passwords to open accounts to see it for myself. No security guide will ever support this, either.
Metro UI is a touch UI, without a touch screen its diminished experience.
It is designed for touch screens, but not useless without. On large monitors, it's actually kind of nice. It brings me a lot of dynamic information right to my screen, and I can customize the crap out of it. Which segways into....
I really like the start button a lot windows 8 does not have it
I agree, and from a productivity standpoint, it should have been left in, or at least offered as a choice to the user...Metro or Standard. However, as mentioned, there are a boatload of apps to add the functionality back in...some free, some paid. It's a shame to have to use 3rd party apps for something so basic, but it's a very minor hurdle, at worst.
Glass was removed because of the resources needed on tablets, they should of left it for premium and ultimate versions for PCs
Maybe so, but it isn't a deal killer for me one way or another. I don't sit at my computers to be awed by effects. I need them for other purposes, whether it be I.T. admin work, web content creation, or even gaming. Lack of Glass has no real affect for me, and in fact, Maximum PC has tested Windows 8 to be faster than Windows 7 on identical hardware. Can't complain about that.
And yes many many think the UI is UGLY google and see
Many people believe our government is run by aliens and is part of a New World Order to control the Earth. Just because you can Google it, doesn't lend any credibility to a viewpoint. Many people think the Nissan Juke is ugly, yet I see them all the time on the roads. Beauty is subjective, and not a topic that can be debated. Someone out there thinks Torri Spelling is hot. Same with Snookie. I rest my case.
Just because Microsoft Improved Windows they could of released 7 sp2 with these improvements instead they added a tablet UI and called it 8, and Microsoft themselves said that 8 is based mostly on 7 so I see no argument that 8 is nothing more than 7 with improvements and a UI to give them a reason to market it as 8 and try to get millions more to buy it thinking the Red dress without rhinestones is better now that it has rhinestones.......................
This is the very same criticism Windows 7 and VIsta were given when they came out. If there's anything to fault Microsoft for, it would be that maybe Windows 8 was pushed out too soon....too soon after Windows 7, for example. However, that doesn't mean anything in terms of Windows 8's quality or usability. It was done so to usher in a new hardware spec...and blur the lines between a tablet and laptop. Software pushing hardware for a change. Usually software trails hardware. It's different...and too many people automatically jump to assuming that's bad. People fear change.
All I'm saying is...use it and give it some time before making up your mind. I hated it the first time I installed a beta. So I waited for it to go final and gave it another shot. It took me some time, but now I really enjoy the OS and think it's another great one. My impressions of Windows 7 haven't changed and I don't think any lesser of 7 now, either.