Windows 7 Home Faster than Ultimate ?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 358
    windows 7 HP 64bit
       #11

    SNaRe said:
    He installed both of them as clean install for test
    Fliplip said:
    Well your mate seems to think so. Thats your answer right there
    I was just trying to explain why your mate might think its faster.
    Like i said, your mate says so and thats based on his testing so i would believe him but that might not be true for everyone's PC.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #12

    there is nothing in ultimate that makes it faster. nor in home.

    i'm no expert, and haven't run tests, but i suspect that home may be a slight teensy-weensy tad faster, because it's a bit liter.

    the possible difference in performance isn't worth worrying about - the difference in price is! there's no point spending a lot extra for ultimate if you don't need the extra features.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 44
    vista
    Thread Starter
       #13

    By the way, someone else asked this question in another forum i have just saw it. There are different thoughts.
    Windows 7 Speed: Home Premium Vs Ultimate - Neowin Forums
    I think i will give a try for both versions ultimate and home . After that i will tell results
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,557
    XP, Seven, 2008R2
       #14

    mickey megabyte said:
    there is nothing in ultimate that makes it faster.
    besides the artificial RAM limit (16GB in HP and 192GB in Ultimate)

    and the CPU/cores limit (1 CPU in HP and 2 CPUs in Ultimate)
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #15

    ok fair enough sup3rsprt - but how many of us need and use more than 16 gigs of ram?

    that's the only thing that made me think twice about getting home - until i realised that 16 should do me for a few more years, and by then the next os will probably be out. :)
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,557
    XP, Seven, 2008R2
       #16

    HP is also limited to one CPU

    Who needs it and who doesn't is not my point. My point is that Ultimate has the potential to be faster than Home edition. Not the other way around.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #17

    put like that, i have to agree. :)
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 115
    Windows 7
       #18

    SNaRe said:
    Today one of my friend told that Windows 7 Home is faster than Windows 7 ultimate.
    I'm always installing ultimate edition of windows 7.
    So is it real? Is there anybody tried it
    Just because your friend tells you something, doesn't make it factual.

      My Computer


  9. Posts : 8,398
    ultimate 64 sp1
       #19

    gizbug said:
    Just because your friend tells you something, doesn't make it factual.

    yes it does, according to a mate of mine...
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 5,642
    Windows 10 Pro (x64)
       #20

    Just because Ultimate has more stuff would not make it slower...after all not EVERYTHING and EVERY FEATURE is running all at the same time. There is ZERO performance difference between Ultimate and Home Premium.

    As pparks1 said in a thread just like this: https://www.sevenforums.com/304889-post8.html
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48.
Find Us