New
#11
there is nothing in ultimate that makes it faster. nor in home.
i'm no expert, and haven't run tests, but i suspect that home may be a slight teensy-weensy tad faster, because it's a bit liter.
the possible difference in performance isn't worth worrying about - the difference in price is! there's no point spending a lot extra for ultimate if you don't need the extra features.
By the way, someone else asked this question in another forum i have just saw it. There are different thoughts.
Windows 7 Speed: Home Premium Vs Ultimate - Neowin Forums
I think i will give a try for both versions ultimate and home . After that i will tell results
ok fair enough sup3rsprt - but how many of us need and use more than 16 gigs of ram?
that's the only thing that made me think twice about getting home - until i realised that 16 should do me for a few more years, and by then the next os will probably be out. :)
HP is also limited to one CPU
Who needs it and who doesn't is not my point. My point is that Ultimate has the potential to be faster than Home edition. Not the other way around.
put like that, i have to agree. :)
Just because Ultimate has more stuff would not make it slower...after all not EVERYTHING and EVERY FEATURE is running all at the same time. There is ZERO performance difference between Ultimate and Home Premium.
As pparks1 said in a thread just like this: https://www.sevenforums.com/304889-post8.html