| Windows 7: Planning to Upgrade My Monitors |
02 Oct 2011
|
#1 | | Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 Tucson, AZ |
Planning to Upgrade My Monitors Is it the graphics cards that determine how large a monitor(s) I can get without losing resolution (quality of image).
I saw some 23" and 25" flat screen monitors yesterday that really have me wanting new (larger) monitors.
If I had two new flat screens, I would not only have larger screens but I would regain a lot of table top space too. I have two 17" ViewSonic A90f+ UltraBrites now. | My System Specs |
| System Manufacturer/Model Number Polywell OS Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 CPU Athlon 64FX Motherboard ASUS M2N32SLI Delux Memory Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 Graphics Card GeForce 7950X2 (Dual) Monitor(s) Displays ViewSonic A90f+ (Two) Screen Resolution 1280x1024 Keyboard Logitech Mouse Logitech PSU TurboColl 1KW Case Polywell Cooling Cool'n'Quiet (Questionable Operation) Hard Drives WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 (Originally Raid5)
Changed to three individual drives after HD crashed. May return to RAID5 if I locate a suitable HD. Internet Speed 1GHertz (I think) Other Info Sony CD-RW CRX320EE
HP DVD Writer 1140d (may need to replace??) |
02 Oct 2011
|
#2 | | Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 Danbury, CT |
Generally, no.
Really high resolutions like 2560X1600 (available with 30" monitors) may require special cards, but the common 1920x1080 won't.
Performance in 3D gaming is another matter, but you probably don't need a high-end graphics card if that's not your object. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number homegrown OS Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 CPU Intel Core I7-3930k Motherboard Asus P9X79 Pro Memory 16 GB Gskill DDR3-2133 Graphics Card eVGA GTX680 Sound Card Creative X-Fi Titanium Monitor(s) Displays As PA246Q Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Keyboard cheap Logitech USB Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer (old optical) USB PSU PCP&C Silencer 750 Crossfire Case Silverstone FT02 Cooling Noctua NH-D14 Hard Drives Corsair Force GT, 120 GB
WDC 1.5TB Caviar Black Internet Speed 6Mb cable Other Info Pioneer BDR-205
Samsung SH-203B
Monsoon 5.1 speakers |
02 Oct 2011
|
#3 | | |
The video card itself has the ability to output a certain resolution. And monitors have a native resolution, or max resolution that they run. In the 23-25" category, that's usually either 1920x1080 or 1920x1200.
Many, like this card, can output up to 2560x1600 Newegg.com - ZOTAC AMP! ZT-50402-10L GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Fermi) 1GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
For basic tasks, like displaying the Windows desktop, or surfing the web...you don't need a powerful video card to hit your monitors native resolution. However, if you are a gamer, the higher the resolution you want to run, the more powerful that your video card must be. Typically, you can run your game at a lower resolution, but unfortunately when the monitors scale back the image, they don't look as sharp. So, you really want to run your monitor at your monitors native resolution.
So, if today, you play games on a 1280x1024 monitor and you want to move to a new 1920x1080 monitor, you must be sure that your video card will be able to handle that increased graphical load from having a larger monitor with a better resolution.
Hopefully that makes sense. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Self-Built in July 2009 OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel Q9550 2.83Ghz OC'd to 3.40Ghz Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R rev. 1.1, F12 BIOS Memory 8GB G.Skill PI DDR2-800, 4-4-4-12 timings Graphics Card EVGA 1280MB Nvidia GeForce GTX570 Sound Card Realtek ALC899A 8 channel onboard audio Monitor(s) Displays 23" Acer x233H Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard ABS M1 Mechanical Mouse Logitech G9 Laser Mouse PSU Corsair 620HX modular Case Antec P182 Cooling stock Hard Drives Intel X25-M 80GB Gen 2 SSD
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Black, 32MB cache. WD1001FALS Internet Speed 15/2 cable modem Other Info Windows and Linux enthusiast. Logitech G35 Headset. |
02 Oct 2011
|
#4 | | Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 Tucson, AZ |

Quote: Originally Posted by pparks1 The video card itself has the ability to output a certain resolution. And monitors have a native resolution, or max resolution that they run. In the 23-25" category, that's usually either 1920x1080 or 1920x1200.
Many, like this card, can output up to 2560x1600 Newegg.com - ZOTAC AMP! ZT-50402-10L GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Fermi) 1GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
For basic tasks, like displaying the Windows desktop, or surfing the web...you don't need a powerful video card to hit your monitors native resolution. However, if you are a gamer, the higher the resolution you want to run, the more powerful that your video card must be. Typically, you can run your game at a lower resolution, but unfortunately when the monitors scale back the image, they don't look as sharp. So, you really want to run your monitor at your monitors native resolution.
So, if today, you play games on a 1280x1024 monitor and you want to move to a new 1920x1080 monitor, you must be sure that your video card will be able to handle that increased graphical load from having a larger monitor with a better resolution.
Hopefully that makes sense. Thanks for the reply. I don't know why I didn't do a search before I asked but I found this to further substantiate your comments. I'm going for it. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Polywell OS Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 CPU Athlon 64FX Motherboard ASUS M2N32SLI Delux Memory Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 Graphics Card GeForce 7950X2 (Dual) Monitor(s) Displays ViewSonic A90f+ (Two) Screen Resolution 1280x1024 Keyboard Logitech Mouse Logitech PSU TurboColl 1KW Case Polywell Cooling Cool'n'Quiet (Questionable Operation) Hard Drives WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 (Originally Raid5)
Changed to three individual drives after HD crashed. May return to RAID5 if I locate a suitable HD. Internet Speed 1GHertz (I think) Other Info Sony CD-RW CRX320EE
HP DVD Writer 1140d (may need to replace??) |
02 Oct 2011
|
#5 | | Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 Danbury, CT |

Quote: Originally Posted by dustywoodworker Thanks for the reply. I don't know why I didn't do a search before I asked but I found this to further substantiate your comments. I'm going for it. The 7950 GX2 is an ancient card, released 5 years ago. I doubt that you'll find one new.
The GTX 590 is the current equivalent (dual graphics processors in package that goes in a single slot), but you may have trouble finding one. There's a third-party card with two GTX 580 processors in a single package, but it's a bit expensive: Newegg.com - Computer Hardware, Video Cards & Video Devices, Desktop Graphics / Video Cards, GeForce GTX 590 (Fermi), GeForce GTX 580 x2 (Fermi)
If you wish to try single-slot SLI, you could consider a dual GTX 460: Newegg.com - EVGA 02G-P3-1387-AR GeForce GTX 460 (Fermi) 2Win 2GB 512-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
($400). I'd recommend a single GTX580 or AMD Radeon 6970. SLI (or Crossfire, the AMD equivalent) works, but is less reliable (IMHO) than a single graphics processor. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number homegrown OS Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 CPU Intel Core I7-3930k Motherboard Asus P9X79 Pro Memory 16 GB Gskill DDR3-2133 Graphics Card eVGA GTX680 Sound Card Creative X-Fi Titanium Monitor(s) Displays As PA246Q Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Keyboard cheap Logitech USB Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer (old optical) USB PSU PCP&C Silencer 750 Crossfire Case Silverstone FT02 Cooling Noctua NH-D14 Hard Drives Corsair Force GT, 120 GB
WDC 1.5TB Caviar Black Internet Speed 6Mb cable Other Info Pioneer BDR-205
Samsung SH-203B
Monsoon 5.1 speakers |
03 Oct 2011
|
#6 | | Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 Tucson, AZ |

Quote: Originally Posted by bobkn 
Quote: Originally Posted by dustywoodworker Thanks for the reply. I don't know why I didn't do a search before I asked but I found this to further substantiate your comments. I'm going for it. The 7950 GX2 is an ancient card, released 5 years ago. I doubt that you'll find one new.
The GTX 590 is the current equivalent (dual graphics processors in package that goes in a single slot), but you may have trouble finding one. There's a third-party card with two GTX 580 processors in a single package, but it's a bit expensive: Newegg.com - Computer Hardware, Video Cards & Video Devices, Desktop Graphics / Video Cards, GeForce GTX 590 (Fermi), GeForce GTX 580 x2 (Fermi)
If you wish to try single-slot SLI, you could consider a dual GTX 460: Newegg.com - EVGA 02G-P3-1387-AR GeForce GTX 460 (Fermi) 2Win 2GB 512-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
($400). I'd recommend a single GTX580 or AMD Radeon 6970. SLI (or Crossfire, the AMD equivalent) works, but is less reliable (IMHO) than a single graphics processor. I do appreciate your input but I must ask. If my existing video cards will function properly and provide the level of resolution that I need/want - why should I upgrade? Is it only because my GPUs are of the old (5 years) technology. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Polywell OS Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 CPU Athlon 64FX Motherboard ASUS M2N32SLI Delux Memory Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 Graphics Card GeForce 7950X2 (Dual) Monitor(s) Displays ViewSonic A90f+ (Two) Screen Resolution 1280x1024 Keyboard Logitech Mouse Logitech PSU TurboColl 1KW Case Polywell Cooling Cool'n'Quiet (Questionable Operation) Hard Drives WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 (Originally Raid5)
Changed to three individual drives after HD crashed. May return to RAID5 if I locate a suitable HD. Internet Speed 1GHertz (I think) Other Info Sony CD-RW CRX320EE
HP DVD Writer 1140d (may need to replace??) |
03 Oct 2011
|
#7 | | Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit 6.1 Build 7601 (SP1) |

Quote: Originally Posted by dustywoodworker why should I upgrade? My now-ancient 9600GT drives my 30" 2560x1600 HP monitor just fine (Dual-DVI connection).
Get the monitor(s) you want: if your card doesn't handle them, you Newegg (for <$100. You don't really need Enrico Fermi to have designed your card unless you are a big-time gaming fanatic). | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit 6.1 Build 7601 (SP1) |
03 Oct 2011
|
#8 | | Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 Tucson, AZ |

Quote: Originally Posted by pparks1 The video card itself has the ability to output a certain resolution. And monitors have a native resolution, or max resolution that they run. In the 23-25" category, that's usually either 1920x1080 or 1920x1200.
Many, like this card, can output up to 2560x1600 Newegg.com - ZOTAC AMP! ZT-50402-10L GeForce GTX 550 Ti (Fermi) 1GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
For basic tasks, like displaying the Windows desktop, or surfing the web...you don't need a powerful video card to hit your monitors native resolution. However, if you are a gamer, the higher the resolution you want to run, the more powerful that your video card must be. Typically, you can run your game at a lower resolution, but unfortunately when the monitors scale back the image, they don't look as sharp. So, you really want to run your monitor at your monitors native resolution.
So, if today, you play games on a 1280x1024 monitor and you want to move to a new 1920x1080 monitor, you must be sure that your video card will be able to handle that increased graphical load from having a larger monitor with a better resolution.
Hopefully that makes sense. Yes, it does make sense and I thank you for your input. I am not a gamer and I do not NEED improved resolution to utilize my computer. The greatest challenge that I present to my graphics cards is an older version of AutoCad. Other than that and Sketchup, I use my commuter for unexciting things like surfing and (personal) financial management.
Two new slim line flat screens would sure reduce the crowded space on my desk though. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Polywell OS Windows 7x32 Home Premium & XP SP3 x86 CPU Athlon 64FX Motherboard ASUS M2N32SLI Delux Memory Corsair CM2X1024-8500C5 Graphics Card GeForce 7950X2 (Dual) Monitor(s) Displays ViewSonic A90f+ (Two) Screen Resolution 1280x1024 Keyboard Logitech Mouse Logitech PSU TurboColl 1KW Case Polywell Cooling Cool'n'Quiet (Questionable Operation) Hard Drives WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 (Originally Raid5)
Changed to three individual drives after HD crashed. May return to RAID5 if I locate a suitable HD. Internet Speed 1GHertz (I think) Other Info Sony CD-RW CRX320EE
HP DVD Writer 1140d (may need to replace??) |
03 Oct 2011
|
#9 | | Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 Danbury, CT |

Quote: Originally Posted by dustywoodworker I do appreciate your input but I must ask. If my existing video cards will function properly and provide the level of resolution that I need/want - why should I upgrade? Is it only because my GPUs are of the old (5 years) technology. I didn't look at your specs tab. If you already have the 7950 GX2, I suggest staying with it. It ought to be OK. (I dimly recall some problem with dual monitors and SLI setups, but it seems like you'd laready know about that.) I got the false impression that you intended to buy one.
(Why do you have a card that was mainly aimed at gamers?) | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number homegrown OS Windows 7 Pro X64 SP1 CPU Intel Core I7-3930k Motherboard Asus P9X79 Pro Memory 16 GB Gskill DDR3-2133 Graphics Card eVGA GTX680 Sound Card Creative X-Fi Titanium Monitor(s) Displays As PA246Q Screen Resolution 1920 X 1200 Keyboard cheap Logitech USB Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer (old optical) USB PSU PCP&C Silencer 750 Crossfire Case Silverstone FT02 Cooling Noctua NH-D14 Hard Drives Corsair Force GT, 120 GB
WDC 1.5TB Caviar Black Internet Speed 6Mb cable Other Info Pioneer BDR-205
Samsung SH-203B
Monsoon 5.1 speakers |
03 Oct 2011
|
#10 | | Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 and Mac OS X 10.8.3 |
Why do you have a card that was mainly aimed at gamers? Good question bobkn.
If you only want to upgrade to save space the I would recomend not to upgrade. If you are not gaming then you don't need all of the flashy new tech that the new monitors have. I think that you would be disapointed if you upgrade. Wait until they die then upgrade. Thats just what I think. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Asus OS Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 and Mac OS X 10.8.3 CPU Intel Core i7-3820 Sandy Bridge-E at 4.75 GHz Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme Memory 8 x Corsair 8GB DDR3 64 GB Kit @1866 Overclocked @2000 Graphics Card GTX 580 and MSI R6870 Sound Card HDMI on GPU and ACL898 Monitor(s) Displays 32" Sony EX-500 120Hz Screen Resolution 1920x1080P Keyboard HP Wireless Elite Keyboard Mouse HP Wireless Elite Mouse PSU Corsair Professional Series Gold AX850 Case Corsair 800D Cooling Corsair H80 High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler Hard Drives 1 x Corsair Force Series GT CSSD-F60GBGT-BK (OS)
2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 750GB (Raid 0)
1 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata III 1TB (Media)
2 x Western Digital Caviar Black Sata II 640GB (Raid 0) Internet Speed Cable, VisionTek Bigfoot Killer 2100 Gaming Network Card Other Info 4 x GELID Solutions FN-TX12-15 120mm Case Fan with Superior Temperature Control
1 x Corsair 140mm Case Fan
1 x SilverStone FP55B Aluminum front panel 5.25" to a 3.5" bay converter
1 x Ultra Card Reader
1 x Sony Blu-ray Burner BD-5300S-0B Planning to Upgrade My Monitors problems? All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM. | |