nVidia GT 220 or 9500 GT?

View Poll Results: Which Card?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • nVidia GeForce GT 220

    3 20.00%
  • nVidia GeForce 9500 GT

    4 26.67%
  • other

    8 53.33%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 21
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #1

    nVidia GT 220 or 9500 GT?


    I'm building a computer and I don't know which one to get. I plan to use it for playing newer games such as SWTFU, Call of Duty, and other uhm...this generation games.

    The system I plan on using it with is as follows:
    Motherboard: ASRock M3A770DE
    Memory: 4GB DDR3
    Processor: AMD Phenom II X2 550 @ 3.31 GHz


    GT 220: Newegg.com - Galaxy 22TGE8HX2IUN GeForce GT 220 1GB 128-bit DDR2 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

    9500GT: Newegg.com - EVGA 01G-P3-N958-LR GeForce 9500 GT 1GB 128-bit DDR2 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card

    I'm looking for a semi-cheap card but at the same time I don't want to sacrifice performance. If you guys recommend something different, feel free to do so lol. I would also like to stay with nVidia, I've always had bad luck with ATI...
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,506
    W7 Ult. x64 | OS X
       #2

    Neither. The memory interface on those cards is low (128-bit). That's why they're so cheap. You'll get much better performance out of a card with a higher memory interface (256-bit+). The ram isn't as important, you can get away with a 512MB card, but if you really want the 1GB it's only $15 more.

    I.E. EVGA GeForce 9800 GT - 512MB 256-bit DDR3 PCIe x16 2.0 $75 after mail in rebate

    If you really want the 1GB of ram, go with this card:

    EVGA GeForce 9800 GT - 1GB 256-bit DDR3 PCIe x16 2.0 $90 after mail in rebate

    Memory interface is much more important than the amount of ram. You'll notice much more difference between the two. ATI increases theirs mostly with GDDR5 ram topping out at 256-bit and NVIDIA stuck with GDDR3 which tops out at about 448-bit so far. According to some sources, GDDR5 is twice as fast but you also have to take into account the memory interface itself with an equivalent ATI card to the 9800 GT only running at 128-bit. The same is with the higher end cards, the high 5 series are 256-bit and the GTX 2 series is 448-bit.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 21
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
    Thread Starter
       #3

    I see, is there a significant difference?
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,506
    W7 Ult. x64 | OS X
       #4

    Between the 512MB and 1GB? I'd say not a huge difference, but there will be a difference. If you're worried about it, spend the extra $15.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 21
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
    Thread Starter
       #5

    I'm not, I'm just wanting to be able to play modern games on max settings without a performance lag. I currently have a GeForce Go 7600 which sucks majorly, especially when playing not-so-much modern games such as Half-Life 2.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 4,280
    Windows 7 ultimate 64 bit / XP Home sp3
       #6

    IMO If your looking to play modern games on max settings without performance lag your going to have to get a much better card. You could probably get by with high settings but not max. My 9800 gt played most games well on high but not max. Their are still some games I can't use max settings on with a GTX 260 superclocked. Fabe
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 429
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #7

    The TouchSmart PC IQ770 has PCI-E 1.0 (HP doesn't say is 2.0/2.1 so I assume its 1.0) and it has a MXM Connector, this will limit what GFX upgrade you can get. Also you have to consider the PSU, if will be powerfull enuff for a better GFX card.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 325
    Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1
       #8

    Fhadso said:
    I'm not, I'm just wanting to be able to play modern games on max settings without a performance lag. I currently have a GeForce Go 7600 which sucks majorly, especially when playing not-so-much modern games such as Half-Life 2.
    those two are low-end cards. so don't dream about max settings. you need at least 260 or HD 5770. and 1GB of memory is much better than 512MB. for example i play GTAIV with everything maxed out and it uses over 700MB of my 1GB card.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 1,506
    W7 Ult. x64 | OS X
       #9

    Seven Eleven said:
    Fhadso said:
    I'm not, I'm just wanting to be able to play modern games on max settings without a performance lag. I currently have a GeForce Go 7600 which sucks majorly, especially when playing not-so-much modern games such as Half-Life 2.
    those two are low-end cards. so don't dream about max settings. you need at least 260 or HD 5770. and 1GB of memory is much better than 512MB. for example i play GTAIV with everything maxed out and it uses over 700MB of my 1GB card.
    Memory matters but the memory interface is twice as important, you're much better off with a card that has less memory but a higher memory interface. Though, if you can get both as in the GTX 260 (448-bit, 896MB) then you're going to be doing better.

    You should really check what your computer can power and support as mentioned. To use a modern card you'll need a PCIe x16 2.0 slot and if you want to use a GTX 260 you'll need atleast a 550 watt PSU maybe more.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 325
    Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1
       #10

    notsograymatter said:
    Memory matters but the memory interface is twice as important, you're much better off with a card that has less memory but a higher memory interface. Though, if you can get both as in the GTX 260 (448-bit, 896MB) then you're going to be doing better.
    agreed. for example: 6200 with 64bit 1GB is a joke.
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:47.
Find Us