SATA drive in USB3.0 Enclosure

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 27
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit with SP1
    Thread Starter
       #21

    398GB left out of 465GB - so its only about 1/6th full - when i formatted the drive i changed the cluster size from 4k to 64k - i was hoping this would have given me alittle more speed as the expense of space, but i knew i wouldnt have used the full 500GB. But this should not effect the drive as when using ATTO, the larger read/writes would show a marked peerformance increase.

    I have just put the drive into a standard SATA to USB connector and received exactly same speeds on usb2 as with the usb3 adapter - im sure that that is pretty slow even for usb2 standards, so im at a loss

    Many thanks for your help though, nice to know folks are around to help in times of need
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,524
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #22

    meddylad said:
    398GB left out of 465GB - so its only about 1/6th full
    bang goes my theory that write speeds were so low cos it was full
    meddylad said:
    I have just put the drive into a standard SATA to USB connector and received exactly same speeds on usb2 as with the usb3 adapter - im sure that that is pretty slow even for usb2 standards, so im at a loss
    USB is very slow haha and those speeds are in my experience pretty normal
    meddylad said:
    Many thanks for your help though, nice to know folks are around to help in times of need
    No problem I just wish we had a better result
      My Computer


  3. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #23

    i ran a 7200RPM Barracuda in my eSata enclosure and a 5400RPM HD that I had recovered from a laptop when I installed an SSD. The results are below.

    My conclusion is that it is the speed of the disk that rules the transfer speed. It would be interesting to test an SSD in both enclosures - but unfortunately I have no loose SSD lying around.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SATA drive in USB3.0 Enclosure-2011-04-16_1204.png   SATA drive in USB3.0 Enclosure-2011-04-16_1217.png  
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,524
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #24

    whs said:
    i ran a 7200RPM Barracuda in my eSata enclosure and a 5400RPM HD that I had recovered from a laptop when I installed an SSD. The results are below.

    My conclusion is that it is the speed of the disk that rules the transfer speed. It would be interesting to test an SSD in both enclosures - but unfortunately I have no loose SSD lying around.
    No me neither :-( Nice speeds all the same and I agree with your conclusion.
    When I copy between disks I get some very high speeds according to windows and I wonder if this is just a windows bug?
    Copying 2,98GB using USB 3 from my Samsung RAID to a 2,5 laptop disc that has been rated previously in this thread by ATTO as being a lot slower
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SATA drive in USB3.0 Enclosure-capture.png  
      My Computer


  5. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #25

    I have just the opposite. When I image to those disks (about 20GB of compressed image), the transfer speeds are a lot slower than the Atto numbers. And it is probably not CPU bound because that is an i7 running at a very low load when imaging.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,524
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #26

    whs said:
    I have just the opposite. When I image to those disks (about 20GB of compressed image), the transfer speeds are a lot slower than the Atto numbers. And it is probably not CPU bound because that is an i7 running at a very low load when imaging.
    Strange but then 20GB is a lot larger than the file I was moving and may have something to do with it.
      My Computer


  7. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #27

    I think next time I will check whether Write Caching is enabled. Last time I did not check that.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 1,524
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #28

    whs said:
    I think next time I will check whether Write Caching is enabled. Last time I did not check that.
    Its worth doing as it makes a difference best if you have a power supply to your externals
      My Computer


  9. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #29

    I have seperate power for the eSata enclosure, but not for the USB3.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 1,524
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #30

    whs said:
    I have seperate power for the eSata enclosure, but not for the USB3.
    Its only in case of a power interruption to avoid data loss I believe that is quite rare and have always enabled these options anyway for the speed benefit
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47.
Find Us