| Windows 7: 16 GB SSD + HDD for storage? |
02 Aug 2011
|
#1 | | |
16 GB SSD + HDD for storage? I'm building a new computer so my idea is to buy a cheaper CPU, but also 16 GB SSD for windows 7 and photoshop + HDD for main storage. If I buy SSD+HHD, will my computer be able to "stand by" for long time (like the new macbook air does)? | My System Specs |
| OS Windows 7 Ultimate x86 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#2 | | Windows 7 x64 Ultimate San Diego |
16 GB SSD? Seems a bit small, not sure if you can really even run windows on that too well, let alone installing any apps.
My windows folder alone is more than that right now... | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Scratch built OS Windows 7 x64 Ultimate CPU i7 960 Motherboard Asus P6X58D Memory 12 Gig Corsair Dominator Graphics Card Nvidia 480 Sound Card Maudio Delta 44 + breakout box Monitor(s) Displays Dell UltraSharp U2410 24in and Samsung 21 dual monitors Screen Resolution 1920x1200 and 1280x1024 Keyboard Logitech G15 + N52 game pad Mouse Logitech MX518 PSU Corasair TX850 Case Cooler Master HAF Cooling Corsair H50 Hard Drives Primary: Intel X-25M G2 160G SSD
Secondary: Segate baracuda 1.0 TB
HDs in AHCI mode. Internet Speed 15kbs down 4.5kbps up Other Info WEI 7.6
CPU & RAM 7.6
Graphics 7.9
Hard disk 7.7 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#3 | | |

Quote: Originally Posted by fseal 16 GB SSD? Seems a bit small, not sure if you can really even run windows on that too well, let alone installing any apps.
My windows folder alone is more than that right now... yeah, I can buy 32 then. Do you think its better to buy a good dual core processor with SSD instead of an intel i3 without SSD? | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Ultimate x86 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#4 | | Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 Florida in winter, Black Forest/Germany |
32GB is still a bit shy. I would recommend at least 50GB.
Regarding SSD or i3 - that is two completely different stories. The SSD will give you fast boot and fast access to programs. The i3 will give you reasonable processing - not really fast for very CPU intensive tasks like e.g. video encoding. Some duo cores are faster - e.g. an Intel E8600. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops OS Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 CPU from 1.6GHz Duo to i7 Monitor(s) Displays 2x HP w2207 Keyboard with trackball - no mices Mouse Trackball mice Hard Drives 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals Internet Speed DSL 6000 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#5 | | |
below 80GB you'll need to install applications to the HDD. I highly suggest 125GB as a minimum. | My System Specs | | |
02 Aug 2011
|
#6 | | |

Quote: Originally Posted by whs 32GB is still a bit shy. I would recommend at least 50GB.
Regarding SSD or i3 - that is two completely different stories. The SSD will give you fast boot and fast access to programs. The i3 will give you reasonable processing - not really fast for very CPU intensive tasks like e.g. video encoding. Some duo cores are faster. so you think I'm better off with a dual core (core 2 duo) instead of an i3? I though like "its new, must have technology". Also, Hackintosh osx86 is not so compatibl with new hardware... I'll choose dual core then, thanks for your help, everyone! | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Ultimate x86 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#7 | | Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 Florida in winter, Black Forest/Germany |

Quote: Originally Posted by brady below 80GB you'll need to install applications to the HDD. I highly suggest 125GB as a minimum. brady, I think that is a bit steep. On my 2 desktops I use 60GB drives and on 3 laptops I use 80 and 90GB drives. I never ran out of space. In my program files I have 1850 folders and over 12.000 files. Some data is on HDDs or on sticks. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops OS Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 CPU from 1.6GHz Duo to i7 Monitor(s) Displays 2x HP w2207 Keyboard with trackball - no mices Mouse Trackball mice Hard Drives 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals Internet Speed DSL 6000 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#8 | | |

Quote: Originally Posted by whs 
Quote: Originally Posted by brady below 80GB you'll need to install applications to the HDD. I highly suggest 125GB as a minimum. brady, I think that is a bit steep. On my 2 desktops I use 60GB drives and on 3 laptops I use 80 and 90GB drives. I never ran out of space. In my program files I have 1850 folders and over 12.000 files. Some data is on HDDs or on sticks. Totally agree on that. 32 gb is enough if you don't install all the apps on SSD. you can install them on HDD. I'm texting on bicycle lol | My System Specs | | OS Windows 7 Ultimate x86 |
02 Aug 2011
|
#9 | | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 L.A. |
What I have done is run 2 80gb and install the system on one with drivers and split up the program files between the 2 ssd's seems to run a lot quicker and it's more efficient...I would recommend at least a 80 for the op system that alone needs 20gb just to give enough breathing room.. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Alienware OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU I7 Motherboard GA-X58-USB3 Memory 6 x 1.5V DDR3 DIMM sockets supporting up to 24 GB of system Graphics Card GeForce GTX 580 Sound Card Realtek ALC892 codec 2/4/5.1/7.1-channel Monitor(s) Displays NEC Display Solutions E321 Black 32" Screen Resolution 1366 x 768 Keyboard Microsoft Mouse Microsoft PSU XFX Black Edition XPS-850W-BES 850W ATX12V Case Antec Cooling Zalman Hard Drives OCZ Colossus LT Series OCZSSD2-1CLSLT1T 3.5" 1TB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive |
02 Aug 2011
|
#10 | | |
Point being that with a larger size drive you don't need to manage the data on your os drive as much as if you split installations and directories. Just trying to keep future "omg my hdd is full" posts down a bit
but to clarify, yes. You don't 'need' a larger ssd. | My System Specs | | 16 GB SSD + HDD for storage? problems? All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM. | |