Show us your SSD performance


  1. Posts : 328
    windows 7 home premium 64, and Windows 10 64 bit
       #1231

    That may be true but my wife can spend a paycheck faster than that!
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 3,253
    Windows 10 Pro x 2/Windows 11 Home
       #1232

    New Intel 510 -120 Gb SSD

    Attachment 145832
    Last edited by IownAmoneyPit; 30 Jan 2012 at 02:48.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #1233

    How does it seem to run?

    The X25-M G2 120GB usually gets +400 score
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 428
    Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
       #1234

    Don't know what the severe graph dips are in HDTune, but the maximum and average numbers appear about right. In AS SSD the Read Acc. time gave an error message for some reason on the first run. Ran the Intel tools and that appears to have corrected whatever occurred. Some of the second run numbers are slightly lower.

    Show us your SSD performance-ssd-benchmark2.png

    Show us your SSD performance-hd-tune-benchmark.png
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 35
    Windows 7 Pro 64bit
       #1235

    rig in sig::
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Show us your SSD performance-crucial-ssd-test-2.jpg  
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 9
    Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit
       #1236

    Hybrid Test Results


    I would like to tap the knowledge base here to assist with ideas on why these disks
    are so slow.

    I purchased 2 Hybrid SATA disks (Seagate Momentus XT 500 GB 7200RPM SATA 3Gb/s 32 MB Cache ST95005620AS ) and configured them as RAID-1 on my Gateway desktop (DX-4320) w/Acer Veriton M430 motherboard.

    They work ok, but when I ran one of the tests (below) they have horrible results.
    I know this is for SSD's but I assume the test is valid for any disk.

    Results (attached).

    Any ideas would be appreciated.

    Thanks
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Show us your SSD performance-hybrid-raid-1-disk-test.jpg  
      My Computer


  7. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #1237

    Some of those numbers are nor bad if you compare them to plain HDDs - this is not an SSD. The SSD part is only used for some buffering - but the backend is always a slow HDD. And judging from the Write -Access time, they are not using a top SSD for buffering either.

    Those hybrids do not seem to sell too well. Here you have the reason. At the end they are HDDs with a better buffer.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #1238

    Wordsworth said:
    Don't know what the severe graph dips are in HDTune, but the maximum and average numbers appear about right. In AS SSD the Read Acc. time gave an error message for some reason on the first run. Ran the Intel tools and that appears to have corrected whatever occurred. Some of the second run numbers are slightly lower.
    Nice scores, The HD Tune was designed for HDDs but alot of people use it for SSDs.
    The dips are usually caused by SSD activity.
    You can test it from a different OS, if you have one, or mini PE OS on a flash drive, and it will be smoother.

    Will get my new X25-M G2 120GB tomorrow
    Laptop will get the X25-V 40GB in its second drive bay.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 428
    Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
       #1239

    Dave76 said:
    Wordsworth said:
    Don't know what the severe graph dips are in HDTune, but the maximum and average numbers appear about right. In AS SSD the Read Acc. time gave an error message for some reason on the first run. Ran the Intel tools and that appears to have corrected whatever occurred. Some of the second run numbers are slightly lower.
    Nice scores, The HD Tune was designed for HDDs but alot of people use it for SSDs.
    The dips are usually caused by SSD activity.
    You can test it from a different OS, if you have one, or mini PE OS on a flash drive, and it will be smoother.

    Will get my new X25-M G2 120GB tomorrow
    Laptop will get the X25-V 40GB in its second drive bay.
    I wondered about the dips whether it was something in the test, or a background process kicking in. I'll take the numbers though.

    From 40GB to 120GB, a little breathing room for ya. :)
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #1240

    It's not too bad, 22.3GB used and 14.8GB free.

    The dreaded winsxs folder is up to almost 6GB, will be a couple of fresh installs tomorrow
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11.
Find Us