Show us your SSD performance

Page 75 of 263 FirstFirst ... 65737475767785175 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #741

    Hi Daisy,

    We're looking at the SSD transfer rates in MB/s, the higher the better, also access times are important, the lower the better.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 8
    windows XP 32bit
       #742

    Dave76 said:
    Hi Daisy,

    We're looking at the SSD transfer rates in MB/s, the higher the better, also access times are important, the lower the better.


    :) Thank you for you Information, my hard drive performance is good.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #743

    Crucial C300 Everest Benchmark...

    Show us your SSD performance-crucial_15_09_2010_1.png
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 18,404
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #744

    ironman3 said:
    OCZ-Vertex2

    I had Win7 installed on a Velociraptor drive with ACHI.
    I simply backed it up with the Win7 backup, replaced the Velociraptor with the OCZ Vertex2 straight from the box, then booted to the Microsoft "System Repair" disk I had made in the backup. I just told it to restore everything from the Velociraptor drive to the OCZ drive, and it worked fine. When the system came up it recognized the OCZ drive as an SSD. I just forced the swap area to be on the D drive, and everything seems fine.

    I'm a little worried about the SMART "Reallocated Sector Count", but the numbers haven't changed since I installed so I suspect it's OK.

    I tried turning off "disk caching". This made the system slow and weird, so I turned it back on. Supposedly this SSD has no internal cache.

    The Smart read there is an error on the HDTune's part. It's fine. Mine is the same way. Some of the bench apps out can't read the Smart right on these ATM. Crystaldiskinfo supposedly does though.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 18,404
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #745

    ATTO bench on my Vertex2 180GB SSD.

    Show us your SSD performance-atto_9_17_2010.jpg

    CDM

    Show us your SSD performance-cdm_9_17_2010.jpg

    AS SSD

    Show us your SSD performance-capture-4-.jpg
    Last edited by Airbot; 17 Sep 2010 at 13:47.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #746

    You should try the AS SSD Benchmark, it factures in random reads more than write, less for sequential, and the access time. Gives a weighted score.

    There was some small changes on score system from 1.0 to 1.1. Score System gives lot more points for random-values than for sequentual.
    It is Score=seq_write * 0.15 + seq_read * 0.1 + 4k_read * 2 + 4k_write + 4_64thrd_write + 4_64thrd_read * 1.5

      My Computer


  7. Posts : 3,028
    Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) SP1
       #747

    Probably the most important result in an SSD benchmark is the random 4K. I like the results here, particularly in the 64 threaded test.

    Show us your SSD performance-crucial_28_09_2010_2.png
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #748

    Airbot said:
    ATTO bench on my Vertex2 180GB SSD.

    Show us your SSD performance-atto_9_17_2010.jpg

    CDM

    Show us your SSD performance-cdm_9_17_2010.jpg

    AS SSD

    Show us your SSD performance-capture-4-.jpg

    I see you added the AS SSD benchmark in, looks good.

    You should get a bit better performance with the Intel RST 9.6.0.1014 files for 64-bit OS driver.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 18,404
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
       #749

    I already have them installed. I've found out this is typical results for the 180GB drive. Rumor has it they have less nands than some of the other ones, like the 100GB.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 12,177
    Windows 7 Ult x64 - SP1/ Windows 8 Pro x64
       #750

    Your AS SSD said msahci, so you changed it to Intel, should show some improvement.

    The nands usually go up with the GBs, must be bigger.
      My Computer


 
Page 75 of 263 FirstFirst ... 65737475767785175 ... LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43.
Find Us