Windows 7 Forums Search
Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows 7. The Windows 7 forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.


Windows 7 - Any relevance to full format after SMART extended test?

 
09-05-2011   #1


Seven Home Premium x64
 
 

Any relevance to full format after SMART extended test?

Hello there. My drive passed SMART extended self test that scans the entire disk surface. Is the full format with command FORMAT FS=NTFS overkill? Thanks!

My System SpecsSystem Spec
09-05-2011   #2


Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1, LinuxMint 9 LTS x64, Debian 6, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS x64
 
 


Hi,

A QUICK format does NOT scan for bad sectors, whereas a FULL format does. So, you can think of it this way:

QUICK Format + CHKDSK /F = FULL Format

If you are confident that your SMART assesment tells you you have no bad sectors, then a QUICK format is probably sufficient. If it was me, and I was doing a completely new installation on a previously used HDD, then personal I would run a FULL Format, regardless of what my SMART assesment would look like. A FULL format takes considerably longer than a QUICK format, but you get the satisfaction of knowing the status of those clusters.

Regards,
Golden
My System SpecsSystem Spec
09-05-2011   #3


windows 7 home premium 64/SP1
 
 


Big ++ on Golden's suggestion. Full format. Another option would be a complete wipe of the hard drive using a 3rd party program.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.


09-06-2011   #4


Seven Home Premium x64
 
 


Hey Golden, how trustworthy do you think SMART scan could be? Could the bad blocks be missed and therefore not remapped?

Since my post I've been reading and now I say yes, the full format after SMART complete scan is overkill because all bad sectors should be reallocated already. In fact I saw some forum posts about chkdsk failing to flag known bad spots - here and quoting someone else here (check his high rank profile): "I have proved many times that Microsoft CHKDSK command missed bad sectors and only using HDD vendor made utilities could find the real problem."

Perhaps if SMART implementation is faulty, then drive utility wouldn't be reliable but (now I know) even Ubuntu trusts Drive Self-Tests.

PS. Are you right about disk check in the full FORMAT for Vista and Seven? You missed this at least: it writes zeros now, which serves to find the bad blocks too when writing fails.

Last edited by o770; 09-06-2011 at 05:19 PM.. Reason: PS
My System SpecsSystem Spec
09-06-2011   #5


Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1, LinuxMint 9 LTS x64, Debian 6, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS x64
 
 


Hi,

The problem is that each disk vendor has their own SMART standards and definitions. In my view, the only way is a FULL format, or if you like, a QUICK Format and CHKDSK/f

Regards,
Golden
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 Any relevance to full format after SMART extended test? problems?



Thread Tools



Similar Threads for: Any relevance to full format after SMART extended test?
Thread Forum
Solved New Build Random BSOD and now SMART Extended Error Crashes and Debugging
SMART Thresholds test problem Performance & Maintenance
SMART Short Self Test Fail Hardware & Devices
FUll format vice Quick Format Installation & Setup


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.



Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd
  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30