New
#621
Thats good and all but the problem is availability for me,dont have much to choose from. So if its not available locally after its release,i will have to go with intel or kingston SSD/s as they are easily available.
Thats good and all but the problem is availability for me,dont have much to choose from. So if its not available locally after its release,i will have to go with intel or kingston SSD/s as they are easily available.
Hello guys,
I have been testing my SSDīs to check itīs performance and I got that above:
The result is attachment!!!!
I have had mounting my machine and needīs some help with that result.
I made the otimasing of my system in order to get better performance on SSDīs, and the lest result that I got is showed in the picture.
I would like a consent with respect to results, because I have seen some systems started being much faster than mine.
If anyone can help me I will be grateful.
My setup is this:
i73930
EVGA X79 FTW
02's SSD RAID0 - Vertex4
02 RAID0 HDD's - Black Edition 60mb - 7200rpm
12gb corsair dominator 2133hz
coller H100
gtx 690
thank you
I would not worry about it. Your 4K nums and your access times are excellent - and those are the ones that count. The other numbers have only statistical value.
Ok brow....thanks anyway, but can you give me a explanation about that variables showed on the table.
The problem is that I have been running the CCLEANER to clean up the registers and erros on my news SSDīs, and when I tested again the benchmark it was given me Scores lower than the first time.
I really became sad with that because I optimaizing all the feautures needed in WIN7 (like as prefich.....defrag....trim...etc) and Win7 dosenīt come fastly how I saw in some youtube videos.
If is possible for you just give me a litle briefing about that variables showed in scrennshoot that I sent you .....I will be greautiful brow.
Anyway....if you have some more tips for me it will be good brother.
Thanks
Hiyya 47 and welcome mate WHS is the man and well seeing your figures against mine and I am no expert mine look pretty sick and well I couldn't wish for a better performance. One could go on forever and have something running befoe you even start it but hey that means running faster than light LOL!!
By the by have you tried the tweaks in Brinks tutorial I do them always and reckon I always get about a 20% minimum increase in speed.
Optimize Windows 7[2]=Performance Maintenance
Hei brow.....
Nice link .....I gonna setting like this post that you have been send me...thanks......anyway....if some mere explanation about my configuration will be apreciate.
Thanks brow.
There is no need to get addicted by the numbers. As I said, if the 4K nums and the access times look OK, then you will get very good OS performance. And a few notches up or down you will never notice in real life.
As to the variation of the numbers I have no good explanation either. CCleaner should not impact them. CCleaner is a good product for cleaning temporary files, but I would not use the registry cleaner - not necessary.
The measuring programs also vary in their results. Even if you make 2 runs one immediately after the other, you will get different results. Sometimes the processes running in the background impact the results.