Windows 7 Forums

Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.


Windows 7: Dual core differences

03 Apr 2012   #1
ICIT2LOL

Desk1 7 Home Prem / Desk2 10 Pro / Main lap Asus ROG 10 Pro 2 laptop Toshiba 7 Pro Asus P2520 7 & 10
 
 
Dual core differences

Have done a lot of Googling and I seem to no further forward with want I would like to know.

There really is a lot of complicated semantics in describing the difference between an Intel dual core and an Intel core - duo that frankly just adds to my confusion.

If I have a machine with an Intel dual core say an E 2160 can I replace it with a higher speed Intel - core duo and vice versa. Or do I have to replace a dual core with a dual core and the same with the "core duo"?


My System SpecsSystem Spec
.
03 Apr 2012   #2
Albuquerque

Windows 7 Professional 64 EFI
 
 

"Core Duo" is a marketing term; dual core is the physical description of a computer system that contains two processor cores.

Your E2160 is a processor based on the LGA775 platform using an 800Mhz FSB. Depending on your chipset, you may be limited to a 'maximum' of an E4700 (LGA775, 800FSB, dual core processor) or you may be able to go as far as an E8600 (dual core) or even up to the Q9650 series (quad core) that are all based on the same socket type.

Essentially, in this case, your chipset determines how much of an upgrade your system can take.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
04 Apr 2012   #3
tman69

win7 ultimate 32bit
 
 

you can replace any LGA775 CPU with a faster one--but--you are still limited by the 'front side bus speed' of both the CPU and the Motherboard--in other words--a faster chip may not necessarily make your machine faster as there are limitations imposed by the bus speed of both CPU and MOBO.

for example an E6750 runs at 2.66 MHz and has a FSB speed of 1333--while an E7500 runs at 2.93MHz but only has a 1066 FSB speed (which is why it costs about 1/2 what the 6750 costs) and it is actually slower.

My QX6850 runs at 3MHZ with a FSB speed of 1333--has 4 cores and is easily 25% faster than either of the other two--but it originally cost $1000 (USD) when it was introduced in 2007--and if you can find a new one now they sell for about $1500 US.

if you desire to do more research--here is a link to a site that I have found to be very useful and informative about CPUs.

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/CPU.html
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.

04 Apr 2012   #4
ICIT2LOL

Desk1 7 Home Prem / Desk2 10 Pro / Main lap Asus ROG 10 Pro 2 laptop Toshiba 7 Pro Asus P2520 7 & 10
 
 

Thanks you folks the front bus is 800Mhz so looks like I will have to look around for her for a suitable CPU those lower numbered E series are cheap enough and couldn't be any slower than the 1.66Ghz that was in there.

Plus thanks for the headsup as that double meaning stuff was a bit confusing, and the link I think I have seen that one before.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
04 Apr 2012   #5
DeaconFrost

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
 
 

As with most processor factors, focus more on the socket than the name, MHz, etc. For example, if you have a Socket 1155 board, that is your starting point to what you can run.

Aside from that, if you know your motherboard model, you should be able to go to their website quickly and find out what families are supported.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
04 Apr 2012   #6
Duzzy

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

Quote:
lower numbered E series are cheap enough and couldn't be any slower than the 1.66Ghz that was in there.
I would aim for a Core 2 Duo E8000 or E7000 series because they include SSE4 and if there's a chance you'll want to run a 64bit OS in a virtual PC then make sure it has Intel's Virtualization Technology.

I'm not sure how much difference SSE4 will make but I do remember seeing a benchmark between my CPU the E5200 and the E8500 for video encoding and the E8500 at stock (3.3GHz) was still faster than the E5200 overclocked at 4GHz. Granted the E5200 is a Intel Pentium Processor but it was stated that the slower benchmark was due to the lack of SSE4.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
04 Apr 2012   #7
ICIT2LOL

Desk1 7 Home Prem / Desk2 10 Pro / Main lap Asus ROG 10 Pro 2 laptop Toshiba 7 Pro Asus P2520 7 & 10
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Duzzy View Post
Quote:
lower numbered E series are cheap enough and couldn't be any slower than the 1.66Ghz that was in there.
I would aim for a Core 2 Duo E8000 or E7000 series because they include SSE4 and if there's a chance you'll want to run a 64bit OS in a virtual PC then make sure it has Intel's Virtualization Technology.

I'm not sure how much difference SSE4 will make but I do remember seeing a benchmark between my CPU the E5200 and the E8500 for video encoding and the E8500 at stock (3.3GHz) was still faster than the E5200 overclocked at 4GHz. Granted the E5200 is a Intel Pentium Processor but it was stated that the slower benchmark was due to the lack of SSE4.
Thanks Duzzy it was the lowest speed core that was in the machine to begin with and I just happened to have a 1.8Ghz one lying around and couple with doubling the RAM (1GB) the difference was noticeable straight away which even the extra RAM didn't have with the 1.6Ghz core in.

Now I have seen some reasonably priced ones on Ebay and as she doesn't have a great expendable income I thought I would get something in the 2.5Ghz range and maybe 2GB RAM which is only going to set her back $80 all up. I don't mind doing this for nothing as the techs in town are outrageously priced for labour. What was throwing me was the difference between what were called dual core and core duo - seems to be a very confusing (for me at least) thing to do.

Thanks to Deacon too I have pulled up the site for the machine (Dell Inspiron) which has a Foxconn G33M02 board but the site and eHOW gives me a plethora of different 775 socket cores that it can use hence my ever increasing confusion in which or what I could use

But anyway thanks to everyones help I think I know now how to fix this up
My System SpecsSystem Spec
04 Apr 2012   #8
Duzzy

Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 
 

No problem. Good luck and I hope everything goes well for you.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 Dual core differences




Thread Tools




Similar help and support threads
Thread Forum
Xeon Dual Core 2.8GHz, can I easily upgrade to Dual Core 3.2GHz ?
I have got a Supermicro X5DA8 mainboard with two Xeon 2.8 GHz processors. Would two of those processors Intel Xeon CPU Processor 3.2 GHz 533 MHz 1MB 604 SL72Y as offered on ebay Intel Xeon CPU Processor 3 2 GHz 533 MHz 1MB 604 SL72Y | eBay work with my mainboard? Super Micro Computer,...
Hardware & Devices
Upgrade from dual core to quad core
First, some keywords to help searchers: QX9650, quad core, task manager, cpu-z, cpu-id, shows showing only 2 two cores. I recently upgraded an Intel E8500 to a QX9650 and had the problem of Windows 7 only showing 2 of the 4 cores. It took a few frustrating hours to find the solution, but I...
Hardware & Devices
Wondering about upgrading from dual core to quad core CPU with Win 7
I am just wondering about the CPU I just ordered from E-Bay new and how it will perform with Windows 7 64 Bit compaired to the one I have now this is the one I ordered: AMD Phenom X4 Quad CPU 9500 AM2+ 2.2 GHz 3600MHz 4MB :D This is the one I have now: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual core 3800+ 2GHz I...
Hardware & Devices
Intel Gives Core i3, Core i5 Dual-Core Processors K0 Stepping Update
more..
News
What is better for PC gaming Dual Core or Quad Core?
i have a Intel E5400 Overclocked to 3.23GHz and was going to upgrade to a Q9400 quad and was wondering as i mainly use my PC for high end gaming is quad core as important as it is used more for multitasking and i was told dual would be better for gaming is this true?
Hardware & Devices
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core RM-75 VS Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
Since I couldn't get specs on the AMD Turion in terms of cache, etc. (the Intel one in the title is 2M Cache, 2.20 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) I couldn't figure out which is the better processor. Does anyone know? Is there also a website I can reference that can compare them?
Hardware & Devices


Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:29.

Twitter Facebook Google+



Windows 7 Forums

Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App