Windows 7 Forums


Windows 7: cpubenchmarks.net says that the FX-6300 is better than the i5 3570k

07 Nov 2012   #1

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 
cpubenchmarks.net says that the FX-6300 is better than the i5 3570k

I was just looking at random cpu's in cpubenchmarks.net and found something really interesting.The FX-6300 is 9 ranks and 301 points MORE than the 3570k. I thought that the FX-8350 was the AMD equivalent. Is it just me or is this actually true?...

My System SpecsSystem Spec

07 Nov 2012   #2

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

Here is a snippit
Attached Thumbnails
cpubenchmarks.net says that the FX-6300 is better than the i5 3570k-capture.png  
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #3

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
Philadelphia, PA
 
 

It shouldn't matter much (the outcome), but it is likely due to the benchmark or however they arrived at the score.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
.


07 Nov 2012   #4

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

Sorry but what do you mean by that, cos i thought it was calculated with the mean(average) score using numerous tests
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #5

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

correct me if im wrong^^^
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #6

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

Can someone please tell me if this is actually true or is it just in 1 specific test if you know what i mean
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #7

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Service Pack 1
Doncaster, UK
 
 

Take a look at this. It quite categorically puts the Intel processor well ahead of the AMD one.

AnandTech - Bench - CPU

In fact, there is only one test where AMD performs better than Intel, and that's the 7-zip test. Even so, the difference (25) is negligible.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #8

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

thx alot, it is just i found that cpubenchmarks.net one so confusing!!
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #9
bej

Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit
 
 

First of all, you are looking at a benchmark rather than real world applications. The FX processors, in general, are better than Intel processors at large multi-tasked, multi-threaded applications because of the number of cores. The I5 3570 is a gaming processor. Games, in general, do not use more than two cores although a few will use three or four.
I suggest you go to anandtech.com, click on "Bench" at the top right of the page, and select "CPU Product Benchmarks". Chose the first CPU as the FX-6300 (it is listed) and the second as the I5 3570. Then, on the left side leave the "Browse CPU Benchmarks" at "Sysmark". Then, over to the right side again and click "View Comparison"
Scroll down and look at the benchmarks for the software and games listed. There is a wide variety to look at.
I believe this will give you a more rounded comparative view of the two processors. A processor should be chosen on your primary use of the computer. GOOD LUCK.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
07 Nov 2012   #10

Windows 7 Ultimate x86
Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
 
 

i have seen it and is pretty much all on the i5's side, could someoen tell me what the cpubenchmarks are based on?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 cpubenchmarks.net says that the FX-6300 is better than the i5 3570k problems?



Thread Tools



Similar help and support threads for: cpubenchmarks.net says that the FX-6300 is better than the i5 3570k
Thread Forum
I5 3570K @4.5GHZ - is this ok? Overclocking and Case Mods
i3 3220 or FX-6300 Hardware & Devices
Wi-Fi Log On Issues with Intel Ultimate-N 6300 Wireless Adapter Network & Sharing
Solved 2120 or 3570k Gaming Hardware & Devices
Connection issues Intel Ultimate-N 6300 Network & Sharing


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd
  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32