eSATA Cable Query

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Posts : 5,642
    Windows 10 Pro (x64)
       #21

    I'm going to chime in with just one tidbit of information.

    The internal SATA connections may be SATA 3, but not all of them. The chip set responsible for SATA will have a limited number of connections for those rated at 6gbps. Therefore they are not going to waste them on external devices, your eSATA port is most likely only capable of SATA 2 (3gbps) speeds. However, it could be SATA 3, one never knows for sure.

    Granted, HDDs are barely capable of reaching SATA 1 speeds.
      My Computer


  2. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #22

    Just for facts - I made a performance comparison eSata and USB3 using HDD, SSHD and SSD. It shows that eSata is fastest.

    SSHD - Performance comparison with HDD and SSD
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 46
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #23

    For clarification, here's the system specification of my machine:
    Laptop Support - Download the latest updates for your laptop/tablet - Toshiba

    It shows SSD for disk drive, but in fact there is a choice of SATA III disk drive or SSD. I chose the disk drive for reasons I've already documented elsewhere in this thread.

    BTW, this machine is only a month old, so I can't see why the internal system bus wouldn't be SATA III. eSATA port is directly connected to that system bus.

    EDIT: That link didn't redirect, as expected. Please enter:
    W50-A-102

    for model number in the lower right corner and then select "Product Specifications" tab.
    Last edited by Iain; 29 Dec 2014 at 11:43. Reason: wonky redirect
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #24

    whs said:
    Just for facts - I made a performance comparison eSata and USB3 using HDD, SSHD and SSD. It shows that eSata is fastest.

    SSHD - Performance comparison with HDD and SSD
    That's on the machine you used for the test. It doesn't tell which standard is actually faster and if the cables are making a difference. Also, USB 3.0 and SATA (which includes e-SATA since they are the same except for the connectors) are different standards.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 46
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #25

    logicearth said:
    I'm going to chime in with just one tidbit of information.

    ...

    Granted, HDDs are barely capable of reaching SATA 1 speeds.
    Even 7200 rpm SATA III drives????????
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #26

    Iain said:
    For clarification, here's the system specification of my machine:
    Laptop Support - Download the latest updates for your laptop/tablet - Toshiba...
    That link still doesn't tell us anything.

    Iain said:
    ...I chose the disk drive for reasons I've already documented elsewhere in this thread...
    Which were completely invalid reasons based on erroneous assumptions. The notebook I'm typing this on uses a lone SSD (500GB Samsung 840 EVO) and runs circles around my fastest 2.5" HDDs, my 500GB WD Blacks (7200rpm) and especially the original 500GB Seagate (5400 rpm) HDD that the notebook came with. The speed difference is so dramatic, I will never, ever own a computer again without at least an SSD boot drive.

    Iain said:
    ...BTW, this machine is only a month old, so I can't see why the internal system bus wouldn't be SATA III. eSATA port is directly connected to that system bus.
    You aren't paying attention. All a system needs to be to qualify as SATA III is to just be faster than SATA II. Rating a system as being SATA III doesn't necessarily mean it will run at full SATA III speeds. If SATA III port (including an e-SATA port) runs off a PCI-e lane or an add-on chip instead of being a port run off the CPU, the maximum speed you will get I only 5Gbps instead of the full 6Gbps of SATA III. Even though a bit slower, 5Gbps still meets SATA III standards. If more than one SATA port runs a single PCI-e lane or the port shares the lane with something else, such as the Wi-Fi card (yes, laptops do have separate Wi-Fi cards; they are just tiny) or Bluetooth, then the available speed will be drastically reduced. However, since the source is still SATA III, the shared port will still be considered SATA III.

    Again, keep in mind that HDDs will not run as fast as the top speed of SATA II so you have nothing to "measure" the speed of a SATA III port, be it standard SATA or e-SATA.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #27

    Iain said:
    logicearth said:
    I'm going to chime in with just one tidbit of information.

    ...

    Granted, HDDs are barely capable of reaching SATA 1 speeds.
    Even 7200 rpm SATA III drives????????
    Actually, 7200 rpm drives can exceed SATA I speeds but will not reach the top speed of SATA II.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 46
    Windows 7 Professional x64
    Thread Starter
       #28

    Lady Fitzgerald said:
    Iain said:
    For clarification, here's the system specification of my machine:
    Laptop Support - Download the latest updates for your laptop/tablet - Toshiba...
    That link still doesn't tell us anything.

    Iain said:
    ...I chose the disk drive for reasons I've already documented elsewhere in this thread...
    Which were completely invalid reasons based on erroneous assumptions. The notebook I'm typing this on uses a lone SSD (500GB Samsung 840 EVO) and runs circles around my fastest 2.5" HDDs, my 500GB WD Blacks (7200rpm) and especially the original 500GB Seagate (5400 rpm) HDD that the notebook came with. The speed difference is so dramatic, I will never, ever own a computer again without at least an SSD boot drive.

    Iain said:
    ...BTW, this machine is only a month old, so I can't see why the internal system bus wouldn't be SATA III. eSATA port is directly connected to that system bus.
    You aren't paying attention. All a system needs to be to qualify as SATA III is to just be faster than SATA II. Rating a system as being SATA III doesn't necessarily mean it will run at full SATA III speeds. If SATA III port (including an e-SATA port) runs off a PCI-e lane or an add-on chip instead of being a port run off the CPU, the maximum speed you will get I only 5Gbps instead of the full 6Gbps of SATA III. Even though a bit slower, 5Gbps still meets SATA III standards. If more than one SATA port runs a single PCI-e lane or the port shares the lane with something else, such as the Wi-Fi card (yes, laptops do have separate Wi-Fi cards; they are just tiny) or Bluetooth, then the available speed will be drastically reduced. However, since the source is still SATA III, the shared port will still be considered SATA III.

    Again, keep in mind that HDDs will not run as fast as the top speed of SATA II so you have nothing to "measure" the speed of a SATA III port, be it standard SATA or e-SATA.
    If you provide a peer-reviewed published report of this, perhaps I might believe that. Until then, your posts are simply anecdotal in nature.

    BTW, read my specification post again. I've tried to ameliorate the lack of redirect by the Toshiba site.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 9,600
    Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
       #29

    Iain said:
    Lady Fitzgerald said:
    Iain said:
    For clarification, here's the system specification of my machine:
    Laptop Support - Download the latest updates for your laptop/tablet - Toshiba...
    That link still doesn't tell us anything.



    Which were completely invalid reasons based on erroneous assumptions. The notebook I'm typing this on uses a lone SSD (500GB Samsung 840 EVO) and runs circles around my fastest 2.5" HDDs, my 500GB WD Blacks (7200rpm) and especially the original 500GB Seagate (5400 rpm) HDD that the notebook came with. The speed difference is so dramatic, I will never, ever own a computer again without at least an SSD boot drive.

    Iain said:
    ...BTW, this machine is only a month old, so I can't see why the internal system bus wouldn't be SATA III. eSATA port is directly connected to that system bus.
    You aren't paying attention. All a system needs to be to qualify as SATA III is to just be faster than SATA II. Rating a system as being SATA III doesn't necessarily mean it will run at full SATA III speeds. If SATA III port (including an e-SATA port) runs off a PCI-e lane or an add-on chip instead of being a port run off the CPU, the maximum speed you will get I only 5Gbps instead of the full 6Gbps of SATA III. Even though a bit slower, 5Gbps still meets SATA III standards. If more than one SATA port runs a single PCI-e lane or the port shares the lane with something else, such as the Wi-Fi card (yes, laptops do have separate Wi-Fi cards; they are just tiny) or Bluetooth, then the available speed will be drastically reduced. However, since the source is still SATA III, the shared port will still be considered SATA III.

    Again, keep in mind that HDDs will not run as fast as the top speed of SATA II so you have nothing to "measure" the speed of a SATA III port, be it standard SATA or e-SATA.
    If you provide a peer-reviewed published report of this, perhaps I might believe that. Until then, your posts are simply anecdotal in nature.

    BTW, read my specification post again. I've tried to ameliorate the lack of redirect by the Toshiba site.
    Frankly, I've had it with you. I'm not completely ignorant and know far more about this than you obviously do, even if only based on your opinions about SSDs. Since you want to insult me, you are on your own.
      My Computer


  10. whs
    Posts : 26,210
    Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
       #30

    Jeannie well said. Don't let him get away with this crap.
      My Computer


 
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:33.
Find Us