Flash Drive Speed

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
       #1

    Flash Drive Speed


    I have a Corsair Flash Voyager pen drive that I installed the W7 setup files on, before my DVDs arrived. I used it to install the RTM on my primary rig, and just a couple of days ago, I tried using it again on my secondary rig, but both times the screen where is says that it is loading Windows files moved like a sick snail across the screen. I thought that it would be faster than the DVD, but that definitely is not the case. I'm going to delete the files on it, to use it for general purposes, but it's performance has me wondering if there is something wrong with the drive, or if it's behavior is typical?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 13,354
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #2

    Make sure USB 2.0 is enabled in the BIOS. You might also try formatting the drive and starting over.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
    Thread Starter
       #3

    2.0 is enabled and at High Speed, so that shouldn't be the issue. I was just thinking of deleting the files on it, but it would be just as easy to reformat, so I try that. I know about the file size limitation of FAT32, but is there any kind of problem with formatting it NTSF? The reason that I ask, is because I understand that FAT32 is generally used on flash drives, but a 4GB limit kind of restricts how I might want to use the drive.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 13,354
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #4

    To put the files on the thumb drive, you need to format it with NTFS. Try this: USB Windows 7 Installation Key Drive - Create

    I use method 2 because it's faster.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
    Thread Starter
       #5

    When I initially created the Windows 7 key on the drive, I used the Microsoft USB/DVD Tool to do so. I don't remember now, but I imagine that it used NTSF to do so. That may be the reason for the speed issue...I don't know. Why is FAT32 preferred for thumb drives...is it a speed factor?
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 13,354
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #6

    Don't use FAT32 for an installation drive... it only works with NTFS. NTFS is faster, I believe.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
    Thread Starter
       #7

    That is the point, with the way that it performs now, I do not want to use it as an installation drive. I'm not certain exactly how I will use it, but it may just become an archive drive. Therefore, I'm interested in how FAT32 performs vs NTSF, without consideration of it's use as an installation drive.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 13,354
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #8
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
    Thread Starter
       #9

    Thanks, that was an interesting read, even though the writer's native language apparently isn't English, because his phraseology is often awkward, leaving a person guessing at his meaning at times. This is also complicated by the fact that his focus on files systems only targeted harddrives...not flash drives.

    What he did say would lead one to think that NTSF would be the preferred FS for flash drives, but it isn't, so I'm still left scratching my head some.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 5,807
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64 - Mac OS X 10.6.4 x64
       #10

    seekermeister said:
    Thanks, that was an interesting read, even though the writer's native language apparently isn't English, because his phraseology is often awkward, leaving a person guessing at his meaning at times. This is also complicated by the fact that his focus on files systems only targeted harddrives...not flash drives.

    What he did say would lead one to think that NTSF would be the preferred FS for flash drives, but it isn't, so I'm still left scratching my head some.
    FAT32 is preferred because NTFS has indexing (which makes writes on the drive) and little compatibility between anything non-MS

    Advantages of FAT32
    No File/Folder Permissions (can't lock yourself out of a file)
    No "Wear and Tear" on a drive
    Can be faster than NTFS (look at benchmarks)
    Greater Compatibility between many OS

    Advantages of NTFS
    File/Folder Permissions (Can lock others out of a file)
    Can have single files of 4GB or higher on the drive

    Now...lets introduce exFAT

    Advantages of exFAT
    Take FAT32 + single files over 4GB - Greater Compatibility between many OS

    Reccomendation? FAT32

    If anyone has anything more to add...than please do so
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58.
Find Us