External Hard-Drive Suggestions?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 13,354
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #11

    I don't think transfer speeds are relevant with external vs internal. USB 2.0 is fast enough that the drive itself is the bottleneck, not the interface.

    Now, get an SSD, and you may see a difference, but as far as I know, the speed of the drive itself is slower than SATA or USB 2.0.

    Correct me if I'm wrong.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 2,164
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
       #12

    Jonathan_King said:
    I don't think transfer speeds are relevant with external vs internal. USB 2.0 is fast enough that the drive itself is the bottleneck, not the interface.

    Now, get an SSD, and you may see a difference, but as far as I know, the speed of the drive itself is slower than SATA or USB 2.0.

    Correct me if I'm wrong.
    Depending on the drives, USB2.0 is the bottleneck. I have 3 WD 1TB Black drives, just happen to have one in a My Book enclosure since I ran out of space inside my pc.
    I get sustained 100+MB/s transfers on the internal Black Drives and upto 88MB/s on the external. The transfer speed goes down when you are transferring a lot of smaller files.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 2,036
    Windows 7 Professional x64
       #13

    It just happens I was using a FreeAgent Go also when I decided to get this. This is my video and in part 2 I show you some tests between USB and eSATA.

    It's a Rosewill RX-358-S External Enclosure

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg1qp52MJJQ

    I LOVE it and you can put a 1.5 or 2TB drive in it.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 565
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #14

    Zepher said:
    Here are 2 of my External WD Mybooks, a 1TB black and a 500GB,


    Windows transfer rates are not realistic due to buffering and burst rates. Show a HDTune benchmark for more realistic transfer rates. Most likely it will be between 30-40MB/s at most. It's the limitation of USB 2.0.

    Edit- Nice pirated movies you got there too!
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 7,878
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #15

    Jonathan_King said:
    I don't think transfer speeds are relevant with external vs internal. USB 2.0 is fast enough that the drive itself is the bottleneck, not the interface.
    The USB 2.0 spec is 480 megabits per second max. Thus, 480 megabits per second, divided by 8 bits to a byte = 60,000,000 bytes per second. However, I have never witnessed USB 2.0 running anywhere close to 100% max...it's at best about 60%. So, about 36MB/s is the best that you get. An internal drive will run 2x faster than that...or more.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 302
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Thread Starter
       #16

    nate42nd said:
    It just happens I was using a FreeAgent Go also when I decided to get this. This is my video and in part 2 I show you some tests between USB and eSATA.

    It's a Rosewill RX-358-S External Enclosure

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg1qp52MJJQ

    I LOVE it and you can put a 1.5 or 2TB drive in it.
    Seems like a very good option, especially since I have two WD Raptor drives available to use but I believe that it is 500gigs total with the 2 if I remember correctly which isn't much when you just have one.

    pparks1 said:
    The USB 2.0 spec is 480 megabits per second max. Thus, 480 megabits per second, divided by 8 bits to a byte = 60,000,000 bytes per second. However, I have never witnessed USB 2.0 running anywhere close to 100% max...it's at best about 60%. So, about 36MB/s is the best that you get. An internal drive will run 2x faster than that...or more.
    I have a mid-tower case which has two drives in it already, it has room for 4 but I'm afraid with the way it is configured with the graphics card haveing 4 would disrupt the airflow. Due to the location of installation on the motherboard for the graphics card it leaves about an inch of space between the top of the hard drive cage and the end of the graphics card which is a EVGA Geforce 9800 GX2. If any of that makes any sense. I could take pics if it doesn't to show. I should have gotten a high tower probably to begin with but I didn't see the point if I was only running 1 graphics card?
    ______________________________________________________________________

    What looks like the best option thus far?

    Thanks,
    -Lollies
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 565
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #17

    pparks1 said:
    The USB 2.0 spec is 480 megabits per second max. Thus, 480 megabits per second, divided by 8 bits to a byte = 60,000,000 bytes per second. However, I have never witnessed USB 2.0 running anywhere close to 100% max...it's at best about 60%. So, about 36MB/s is the best that you get. An internal drive will run 2x faster than that...or more.
    That's because a percentage of the USB 2.0 bandwidth is reserved for USB protocol overhead.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 302
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Thread Starter
       #18

    What would be a good drive to accompany the Rosewill RX-358-S External Enclosure? I'd like a 500g-1TB of space. In my comp I have 2 WD veloci-raptors.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 9,606
    Win7 Enterprise, Win7 x86 (Ult 7600), Win7 x64 Ult 7600, TechNet RTM on AMD x64 (2.8Ghz)
       #19
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 302
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Thread Starter
       #20

    For an external would Western Digital Caviar Black WD1001FALS 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive -Bare Drive be efficient? I've been looking at WD's drives on newegg.
      My Computer


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54.
Find Us