Should I refund my laptop?

View Poll Results: should i refund it?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • yay

    2 100.00%
  • nay

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  1. Posts : 1,660
    Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
       #1

    Should I refund my laptop?


    as you probably know my netbook has the GMS 500 AKA satan's mobile gpu. A few weeks ago i got pissed off enough to file a complaint with the BBB which set it to Intel. The complaint had the requirement of new drivers, replacement, or a refund.

    They have accepted the refund for $347.

    Problem is, I kinda like having a laptop, and this was and is the cheapest computer that has a bigger than 13" screen. However, I already have an office set up with a bigger screen eta so the size wouldn't bee that much of a problem, and I believe that for the amount of time I use it without my external screen/keyboard/etc, it may be fine as long as I can find a better netbook for the same price.

    So, do you think I should accept the refund?
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,660
    Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
    Thread Starter
       #2

    Ideally I'd replace it with something with the ION, but the only one I can find is a HP mini in Costco for $500
    Turns out the 950 and the 3150 both kick the 500's butt, so I may look at them.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 3,639
    Windows 7 Ultimate, OS X 10.7, Ubuntu 11.04
       #3

    All I can say is all the Intel Graphics are pathetic. I know.. I have the Intel GMA 4500MHD.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,705
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 ®™
       #4

    Yes if you ripped it off.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 1,660
    Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
    Thread Starter
       #5

    I have to return my laptop to do so...
    I'm wondering if it's worth the effort, because it works fine aside from the lost potential...
    I'm thinking I may just hold on to it for now; it suits my purposes fine and anything with non-intel graphics costs twice as much as this.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 3,187
    Main - Windows 7 Pro SP1 64-Bit; 2nd - Windows Server 2008 R2
       #6

    IceFire said:
    ...it works fine aside from the lost potential...

    ...it suits my purposes fine...
    What potential has it lost (that you actually miss), seeing as how it suits your purposes fine?
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 1,660
    Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
    Thread Starter
       #7

    DirectX 10, OpenGL 2, and other hardware optimizations that would otherwise make it faster than the GMA 950, as was it's original design.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 3,187
    Main - Windows 7 Pro SP1 64-Bit; 2nd - Windows Server 2008 R2
       #8

    It would be a hard call for me, were I in your position. On the one hand, if it did everything I needed it to do I would be happy. On the other hand, I would be cheesed if I felt like it was not doing all it could do based on something as simple as a crummy driver.

    (I'm a lot of help, ain't I? )
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 1,660
    Windows 8 Pro (32-bit)
    Thread Starter
       #9

    yeah that pretty much sums it up.
    i just checked and it decodes 1080P wmv fine. the only other cheap gc that has hd deciding is the ion chipset, which is much more expensive.
    Another nail in the coffin for returning this.

    and, who knows? maybe Intel will magically pump out the correct drivers for this. there's a rumour about Gallium3D based drivers for Linux, which will be relatively easy to port.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 2,685
    Windows 7 Ultimate x86-64
       #10

    Return it - you are not satisfied.
      My Computer


 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26.
Find Us