
Quote: Originally Posted by
Teerex

Quote: Originally Posted by
jimbo45
Hi there
For an ordinary user I'd say keep your money for the moment -- there aren't enough differences to make it a worthwhile upgrade. In fact even Office 2003 is good enough for 99.99% of tasks most people will want to do.
Cheers
jimbo
These things you're sayin hurt Microsoft deeply.

Maybe that's why they reduced the nr of keys in technet subscriptions

but that's another story.
MS with its office products is actually looking to the workplace rather than individual users. There's plenty of cheapish (legal Home and Student) versions of Office 2010 around for those that either have new machines or really want to try it out.
Remember these Student versions don't have OUTLOOK in them so you'll need another email client.
As I posted previously for a home user who already has OFFICE 2007 or even OFFICE 2003 I'd wait until something a bit more exciting appears -- say WINDOWS 8 with MS OFFICE 2014.
I think actually naming products with a year in them such as say Office 2007 or Windows Server 2003 isn't a good idea -- however if it is intended to frighten people into thinking the products are old and decrepit so they upgrade then that strategy has quite clearly failed.
I'm still running Windows 2003 server -- excellent and have no reason to upgrade it anytime soon for my server stuff.
Cheers
jimbo