Wow!!! Dont care about standards? Frames and tables? Used it for years... So why arent you still running Win98SE???
I used to use FP to produce corporate sites, I havent used it in years, too outdated too limited.
If you arent moving ahead and learning in this industry then you are losing ground to someone who is!
Keep running in reverse with your dinosaur! Muhahahaaaaa!!! LOL!!!!
Here is why I don't care. I use FP for my Web based business site, which is retail based, I have about 4 main keywords I target for my site and about 8 - 10 others that are secondary targets. I'm number one in Google, Yahoo and Bing for all of those keywords and have been for years. And I'm running up against BIG corporate sites for these keywords such as Disney, Amazon and eBay. Why would I change something that works for me and my business? I know the software, I know how to get it to do what I want, and it works.
So yeah, perhaps I'm riding a dinosaur, but I like where it's taken me so far. Oh, and notepad is my secondary editor for quick adjustments, so I guess I am using some Win98SE technology as well.
Side note: New "standards" and "compliances" are great economic drivers.
But, so I'm not ending on an arrogant, I know everything note, I have to admit that my site doesn't require the top flashy stuff, I'm selling watches, and there's only so many ways you can present a watch, so FP suits my needs fine. Obviously it won't suit the needs of someone wanting all the latest and greatest. So my whole point to this rant is that everyone has their tools that they personally like, to accomplish what they wish for their site. If someone chooses to use a dinosaur to work with because it does what they need, then why should anyone jump on them for their choice?
*Insert Darryl Licht coming compliance rant here and completely ignore that FP works for some*