| Windows 7: jpg compression quality in windows 7 poorer than xp |
22 Mar 2010
|
#1 | | |
jpg compression quality in windows 7 poorer than xp I have noticed that Windows 7 seems to create a lower quality jpg then Windows xp used to.
This happens when I click the email button at the top of the photos folder, select a size, example Medium: 1024 x 768, it will create a new email windows with all the emails attached, ok, nice.
But when you view each photo the jpg compression seems to be alot poorer than xp. The file size is small, but the photos appear noticeably grainer & fuzzier etc because of what seems to me to be compression issue.
Is there any way to fix or modify the settings. I use this feature alot to resize a whole collection of images, but now they are low quality.
Anybody else find a fix or edit for this?
Thanks. | My System Specs |
| |
23 Mar 2010
|
#2 | | |
I'm not sure if it's windows or the email client that resizes the picture. But if you need a tool to resize a number of pictures you may try FastStone Image Viewer ; a very nice freebie (5 stars on CNET) Quote: FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. It has a nice array of features that include image viewing, management, comparison, red-eye removal, emailing, resizing, cropping and color adjustments. Its innovative but intuitive full-screen mode provides quick access to EXIF information, thumbnail browser and major functionalities via hidden toolbars that pop up when your mouse touches the four edges of the screen. Other features include a high quality magnifier and a musical slideshow with 150+ transitional effects, as well as lossless JPEG transitions, drop shadow effects, image annotation, scanner support, histogram and much more. It supports all major graphic formats (BMP, JPEG, JPEG 2000, animated GIF, PNG, PCX, TIFF, WMF, ICO and TGA) and popular digital camera RAW formats (CRW, CR2, NEF, PEF, RAF, MRW, ORF, SRF and DNG). Details and download here | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number ~DIY OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.40 GHz Motherboard Gygabyte P35-DS3L Memory 8GB Transcend DDRII-800 @ 888 Graphics Card MSI NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 / 1GB DDR3 Sound Card Integrated Realtek HD Audio ALC888 Monitor(s) Displays Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 22" Screen Resolution 1680*1050 Keyboard A4 Tech A-Shape PS/2 Keyboard Mouse eBox USB Mouse PSU Unnamed 550W Case Naked chassis Cooling Lots of fans Hard Drives 2 x WD Caviar Green 1TB (WDC WD10EADS) Internet Speed 1 Mbps\512 Kbps (through a very very bad ISP) Other Info Currently undervolting the CPU to reduce the fan's noise |
23 Mar 2010
|
#3 | | Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 Florida in winter, Black Forest/Germany |
.png gives you better quality than .jpg | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops OS Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8 CPU from 1.6GHz Duo to i7 Monitor(s) Displays 2x HP w2207 Keyboard with trackball - no mices Mouse Trackball mice Hard Drives 5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals Internet Speed DSL 6000 |
24 Mar 2010
|
#4 | | |
I've posed this issue on here before with no solutions other than "have you tried this other program x?" when it's not a program-specific problem. There is no answer as to why pictures appear to be poorer quality on Win 7 as compared to XP (comparing the exact same two images), particularly in zooming. When I zoom on my images in Windows 7, it does absolutely no smoothing and provides jagged edges and terrible zoom quality, while XP smooths them.
From my attempts at fixing it, it's not codec issues, it's just Windows 7's way of rendering images with a different rendering engine as compared to XP and I have no clue how to change it.
Good luck in finding the answer on this one, because I sure haven't. | My System Specs | | OS XP / Win7 x64 Pro CPU Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz Motherboard Asus P5-E Memory 2x2GB GSkill DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA) Monitor(s) Displays Dell 2408WFP Screen Resolution 1920x1200 |
25 Mar 2010
|
#5 | | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Athens, Greece |
I have the same problem but it's not a problem I think.. I recently bought a new machine and installed Windows 7 after many years of XP.
Quality of Jpeg compression is times worse than in XP although I summarized that the bad quality is only "fake". I do plenty of jpeg compression daily - 50kb thumbnails for my website and everyone reports that the quality hasnt changed on their side. I viewed the same thumbnails on my previous machine - XP - they all look perfectly fine.
I found out my new graphic card, HD resolution and probably Windows 7 visualization give an illusion of a worse quality. Have you changed any hardware too ? | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Personally Assembled OS Windows 7 Ultimate x64 CPU Intel Core I7 920 Motherboard Evga X58 SLI LE Memory 12 GB Corsair DDR3-1600 PC3 12800 Graphics Card eVGA GeForce GTS 250 1 GB Sound Card Presonus Firebox/FS Monitor(s) Displays LG W2753 27" Screen Resolution 1920x1080 Keyboard Standard MS keyboard Mouse Standard MS mouse PSU CoolerMaster UCP 1100W Case Lian Li PC-50 Aluminum Tower Cooling CoolerMaster V10 Hard Drives 2x A-DATA SSD 64GB
1x WD VR 150GB 10K (Internal)
2x WD RE3 750 GB (32MB cache, 7200) (Internal)
5x Various WD (External) Internet Speed 24/1 Mbit ADSL2+ |
25 Mar 2010
|
#6 | | |
Nope, no hardware change at all. I dual boot XP and Windows 7 and have been doing direct comparisons since the early beta stages of Windows 7, with no fix for the quality even in the RTM Pro version I have.
I am running an Asus P5E mobo with GeForce 8600GTS card and have tried all sorts of different, earlier, beta, and Vista drivers to see if it was graphics card related and it's not. Native resolution on everything looks amazing. It's only when you change it at all from native resolution that things start appearing lesser quality. I have no clue as to why. | My System Specs | | OS XP / Win7 x64 Pro CPU Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz Motherboard Asus P5-E Memory 2x2GB GSkill DDR2 Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA) Monitor(s) Displays Dell 2408WFP Screen Resolution 1920x1200 |
25 Mar 2010
|
#7 | | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit SP 1 |

Quote: Originally Posted by 16cowboy I have noticed that Windows 7 seems to create a lower quality jpg then Windows xp used to.
This happens when I click the email button at the top of the photos folder, select a size, example Medium: 1024 x 768, it will create a new email windows with all the emails attached, ok, nice.
But when you view each photo the jpg compression seems to be alot poorer than xp. The file size is small, but the photos appear noticeably grainer & fuzzier etc because of what seems to me to be compression issue.
Is there any way to fix or modify the settings. I use this feature alot to resize a whole collection of images, but now they are low quality.
Anybody else find a fix or edit for this?
Thanks. Really ? For the first time I heard it. Know why? I generally use .png format, and the guys Iknow do as well as me  Coz .png gives better quality than .jpg. If the size is a matter , you may compress as .jpg, otherwise shift to .png | My System Specs | | Computer type PC/Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number Self Assembled OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit SP 1 CPU Intel Core i3 2120 @ 3.30GHz Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H61M-DS2 DVI Memory Corsair 2GB x2 (Single-Channel DDR3 @ 665MHz) Graphics Card 2047MB GeForce GTS 450 (ZOTAC International) Sound Card Onboard (Realtek High Definition Audio) Monitor(s) Displays LG Flatron E2040T Screen Resolution 1600x900 Keyboard Logitech MK220 Mouse Logitech MK220 PSU uMAX 750 watt. Case iBall Cooling Air/ Fans Hard Drives Western Digital 1 TB
Seagate 500 GB Internet Speed BSNL Broadband Antivirus Microsoft Security Essentials Browser Waterfox Other Info Dell Studio 15" Laptop |
28 Mar 2010
|
#8 | | Windows 7 home premium with 64 bit |
It should be as good or better. I would like to know the answer also because I think I noticed it also. I doubt if any video card would change anything because 2-D images aren't affected by cards. | My System Specs | | System Manufacturer/Model Number Dell 546 Inspiron desktop OS Windows 7 home premium with 64 bit CPU AMD Athlon 630 2.8ghz X4 (Quad) Motherboard Dell 780g Memory 8 Gigs of ddr2 at 800 mhz Graphics Card Dell integrated ATI 3200 Sound Card None Monitor(s) Displays 20" Dell Screen Resolution 1200x1600 Keyboard Dell Mouse Logitech trackball (marble mouse) PSU 300 Watts Dell Case Mini-tower Cooling 3 Fans total at PSU, CPU, and case. Hard Drives Two 1TRB Seagate Barracuda drives with a 32MB cache in raid 1 (Mirrored) Internet Speed DSL Other Info Western Digital 1.5tb external drive (green back-up drive) Cool and quiet! |
31 Mar 2010
|
#9 | | |
I am in the same camp as FliGi7..
No hardware changes, not looking for other software recommendations, I already have photoshop, Picassa, etc etc, and dozens more available.
I liked using the email photos method just worked the best & fastest for me, and ts something with the way Windows 7 resizes & compresses compared to XP.
Thanks for your responses, please post more if you find anything. | My System Specs | | |
28 Apr 2010
|
#10 | | |
Anybody found a update or a solution to this, still very annoying!
XP was better quality after resizing.. | My System Specs | | jpg compression quality in windows 7 poorer than xp problems? All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM. | |