jpg compression quality in windows 7 poorer than xp

16cowboy

New member
I have noticed that Windows 7 seems to create a lower quality jpg then Windows xp used to.

This happens when I click the email button at the top of the photos folder, select a size, example Medium: 1024 x 768, it will create a new email windows with all the emails attached, ok, nice.

But when you view each photo the jpg compression seems to be alot poorer than xp. The file size is small, but the photos appear noticeably grainer & fuzzier etc because of what seems to me to be compression issue.

Is there any way to fix or modify the settings. I use this feature alot to resize a whole collection of images, but now they are low quality.

Anybody else find a fix or edit for this?
Thanks.
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7
I'm not sure if it's windows or the email client that resizes the picture. But if you need a tool to resize a number of pictures you may try FastStone Image Viewer ; a very nice freebie (5 stars on CNET)

FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. It has a nice array of features that include image viewing, management, comparison, red-eye removal, emailing, resizing, cropping and color adjustments. Its innovative but intuitive full-screen mode provides quick access to EXIF information, thumbnail browser and major functionalities via hidden toolbars that pop up when your mouse touches the four edges of the screen. Other features include a high quality magnifier and a musical slideshow with 150+ transitional effects, as well as lossless JPEG transitions, drop shadow effects, image annotation, scanner support, histogram and much more. It supports all major graphic formats (BMP, JPEG, JPEG 2000, animated GIF, PNG, PCX, TIFF, WMF, ICO and TGA) and popular digital camera RAW formats (CRW, CR2, NEF, PEF, RAF, MRW, ORF, SRF and DNG).

Details and download here
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
~DIY
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.40 GHz
Motherboard
Gygabyte P35-DS3L
Memory
8GB Transcend DDRII-800 @ 888
Graphics Card(s)
MSI NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 / 1GB DDR3
Sound Card
Integrated Realtek HD Audio ALC888
Monitor(s) Displays
Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 22"
Screen Resolution
1680*1050
Hard Drives
2 x WD Caviar Green 1TB (WDC WD10EADS)
PSU
Unnamed 550W
Case
Naked chassis
Cooling
Lots of fans
Keyboard
A4 Tech A-Shape PS/2 Keyboard
Mouse
eBox USB Mouse
Internet Speed
1 Mbps\512 Kbps (through a very very bad ISP)
Other Info
Currently undervolting the CPU to reduce the fan's noise
.png gives you better quality than .jpg
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
HP, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba - 4 laptops and 2 desktops
OS
Vista, Windows7, Mint Mate, Zorin, Windows 8
CPU
from 1.6GHz Duo to i7
Monitor(s) Displays
2x HP w2207
Hard Drives
5x HDD, 7x SSD, 12x Externals
Keyboard
with trackball - no mices
Mouse
Trackball mice
Internet Speed
DSL 6000
I've posed this issue on here before with no solutions other than "have you tried this other program x?" when it's not a program-specific problem. There is no answer as to why pictures appear to be poorer quality on Win 7 as compared to XP (comparing the exact same two images), particularly in zooming. When I zoom on my images in Win7, it does absolutely no smoothing and provides jagged edges and terrible zoom quality, while XP smooths them.

From my attempts at fixing it, it's not codec issues, it's just Win7's way of rendering images with a different rendering engine as compared to XP and I have no clue how to change it.

Good luck in finding the answer on this one, because I sure haven't.
 

My Computer

OS
XP / Win7 x64 Pro
CPU
Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard
Asus P5-E
Memory
2x2GB GSkill DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA)
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2408WFP
Screen Resolution
1920x1200
I have the same problem but it's not a problem I think.. I recently bought a new machine and installed win7 after many years of XP.
Quality of Jpeg compression is times worse than in XP although I summarized that the bad quality is only "fake". I do plenty of jpeg compression daily - 50kb thumbnails for my website and everyone reports that the quality hasnt changed on their side. I viewed the same thumbnails on my previous machine - XP - they all look perfectly fine.
I found out my new graphic card, HD resolution and probably Win7 visualization give an illusion of a worse quality. Have you changed any hardware too ?
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Personally Assembled
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
CPU
Intel Core I7 920
Motherboard
Evga X58 SLI LE
Memory
12 GB Corsair DDR3-1600 PC3 12800
Graphics Card(s)
eVGA GeForce GTS 250 1 GB
Sound Card
Presonus Firebox/FS
Monitor(s) Displays
LG W2753 27"
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
2x A-DATA SSD 64GB
1x WD VR 150GB 10K (Internal)
2x WD RE3 750 GB (32MB cache, 7200) (Internal)
5x Various WD (External)
PSU
CoolerMaster UCP 1100W
Case
Lian Li PC-50 Aluminum Tower
Cooling
CoolerMaster V10
Keyboard
Standard MS keyboard
Mouse
Standard MS mouse
Internet Speed
24/1 Mbit ADSL2+
Nope, no hardware change at all. I dual boot XP and Win7 and have been doing direct comparisons since the early beta stages of Win7, with no fix for the quality even in the RTM Pro version I have.

I am running an Asus P5E mobo with GeForce 8600GTS card and have tried all sorts of different, earlier, beta, and Vista drivers to see if it was graphics card related and it's not. Native resolution on everything looks amazing. It's only when you change it at all from native resolution that things start appearing lesser quality. I have no clue as to why.
 

My Computer

OS
XP / Win7 x64 Pro
CPU
Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard
Asus P5-E
Memory
2x2GB GSkill DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA)
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2408WFP
Screen Resolution
1920x1200
I have noticed that Windows 7 seems to create a lower quality jpg then Windows xp used to.

This happens when I click the email button at the top of the photos folder, select a size, example Medium: 1024 x 768, it will create a new email windows with all the emails attached, ok, nice.

But when you view each photo the jpg compression seems to be alot poorer than xp. The file size is small, but the photos appear noticeably grainer & fuzzier etc because of what seems to me to be compression issue.

Is there any way to fix or modify the settings. I use this feature alot to resize a whole collection of images, but now they are low quality.

Anybody else find a fix or edit for this?
Thanks.

Really ? For the first time I heard it. Know why? I generally use .png format, and the guys Iknow do as well as me :D Coz .png gives better quality than .jpg. If the size is a matter , you may compress as .jpg, otherwise shift to .png
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Assembled
OS
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Insider Preview 64-bit
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B85M-D3H
Memory
Corsair Vengence 4GB x2 (8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz)
Graphics Card(s)
2047MB GeForce GTS 450 (ZOTAC International)
Sound Card
Onboard (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Monitor(s) Displays
LG Flatron E2040T
Screen Resolution
1600x900
Hard Drives
Western Digital 1 TB
Seagate 500 GB
PSU
Corsair VS550
Case
Cooler Master K380
Cooling
Cooler Master Seidon 120V Plus
Keyboard
Logitech MK260r
Mouse
Logitech MK260r
Internet Speed
PMPL Broadband
Antivirus
Windows Defender + MBAM
Browser
Firefox
Other Info
Dell Studio 15" Laptop
It should be as good or better. I would like to know the answer also because I think I noticed it also. I doubt if any video card would change anything because 2-D images aren't affected by cards.
 

My Computer

Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Dell 546 Inspiron desktop
OS
Windows 7 home premium with 64 bit
CPU
AMD Athlon 630 2.8ghz X4 (Quad)
Motherboard
Dell 780g
Memory
8 Gigs of ddr2 at 800 mhz
Graphics Card(s)
Dell integrated ATI 3200
Sound Card
None
Monitor(s) Displays
20" Dell
Screen Resolution
1200x1600
Hard Drives
Two 1TRB Seagate Barracuda drives with a 32MB cache in raid 1 (Mirrored)
PSU
300 Watts Dell
Case
Mini-tower
Cooling
3 Fans total at PSU, CPU, and case.
Keyboard
Dell
Mouse
Logitech trackball (marble mouse)
Internet Speed
DSL
Other Info
Western Digital 1.5tb external drive (green back-up drive) Cool and quiet!
I am in the same camp as FliGi7..

No hardware changes, not looking for other software recommendations, I already have photoshop, Picassa, etc etc, and dozens more available.

I liked using the email photos method just worked the best & fastest for me, and ts something with the way Windows 7 resizes & compresses compared to XP.

Thanks for your responses, please post more if you find anything.
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7
Anybody found a update or a solution to this, still very annoying!
XP was better quality after resizing..
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7
Anybody found a update or a solution to this, still very annoying!
XP was better quality after resizing..
Programs like Adobe Photoshop have an option to save qulity adjustment option, Which windows or MS Paint dont have !
As a free application, you can use IrfanView . That as gives this option.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    49.3 KB · Views: 4

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Assembled
OS
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Insider Preview 64-bit
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B85M-D3H
Memory
Corsair Vengence 4GB x2 (8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz)
Graphics Card(s)
2047MB GeForce GTS 450 (ZOTAC International)
Sound Card
Onboard (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Monitor(s) Displays
LG Flatron E2040T
Screen Resolution
1600x900
Hard Drives
Western Digital 1 TB
Seagate 500 GB
PSU
Corsair VS550
Case
Cooler Master K380
Cooling
Cooler Master Seidon 120V Plus
Keyboard
Logitech MK260r
Mouse
Logitech MK260r
Internet Speed
PMPL Broadband
Antivirus
Windows Defender + MBAM
Browser
Firefox
Other Info
Dell Studio 15" Laptop
I see what you're getting at, but it has nothing to do with the quality of the actual photo. If it did, XP would display it just as poorly.
 

My Computer

OS
XP / Win7 x64 Pro
CPU
Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard
Asus P5-E
Memory
2x2GB GSkill DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA)
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2408WFP
Screen Resolution
1920x1200
I see what you're getting at, but it has nothing to do with the quality of the actual photo. If it did, XP would display it just as poorly.
Just so that I get my head round this problem as I have only just got to this thread. Are you saying that if you create a jpeg at a certain size and compression, if you view that in "a program" in Windows 7 then boot into XP in the same machine, use the same program and image file then the XP view looks better quality than the Win 7?
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 Multiprocessor Free Service Pack 1
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Motherboard
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. P8H77-M
Memory
8.00 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
Sound Card
On Board
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 24"
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
(1) INTEL SSDSC2CT180A3 ATA Device (2) ST500DM002-1BD142 ATA Device (3) WDC WD3200AAKS-75L9A0 ATA Device (4) Generic- Compact Flash USB Device (5) Generic- MS/MS-Pro USB Device (6) Generic- SD/MMC USB Device (7) Generic- SM/xD-Picture USB
PSU
500w Corsair
Case
Cooler Master
Cooling
3 Fans
Keyboard
Logitech MK300
Mouse
Logitech WOM
Internet Speed
75Mb
Antivirus
Norton 360
Browser
Firefox, Opera, IE
Hmm very unusual there might be a registry hack deep within Windows to adjust the quality... We'll have to have a look into this matter.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit)
CPU
Intel I5 2500K 3.3Ghz Stock
Motherboard
Asus P8H 61-M LE USB 3
Memory
8Gig Kingston DDRIII HyperX Blue 1333 Mhz
Graphics Card(s)
AMD Sapphire 7870 2GB
Sound Card
Creative Fatality Pro
Monitor(s) Displays
27" BENQ LED
Screen Resolution
1920X1080
Hard Drives
1 x OCZ Agility 3 120GB SSD
1 x Seagate 250GB
1 x Western Digital 1000GB
1 x HP 500GB
PSU
700W Coolermaster Stealth Pro etc
Case
Coolermaster Scout
Cooling
Some fans
Keyboard
Some Logitech type.
Mouse
Logitech MX518
Internet Speed
Wireless 8mb
Other Info
Canon Scanner
Epson Printer
Nikon DSLR 3000
Wacom Tablet
Hmm very unusual there might be a registry hack deep within Windows to adjust the quality... We'll have to have a look into this matter.
Well I have done a test with half a dozen jpeg all at 12 level of compression and I can't see any difference at all in the quality when in Win 7 or XP. The images were from RAW files, post processed in PS Elements 6 all sized the same and saved to JPEG level 12.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
OS
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 7601 Multiprocessor Free Service Pack 1
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Motherboard
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. P8H77-M
Memory
8.00 GB
Graphics Card(s)
Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000
Sound Card
On Board
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 24"
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080
Hard Drives
(1) INTEL SSDSC2CT180A3 ATA Device (2) ST500DM002-1BD142 ATA Device (3) WDC WD3200AAKS-75L9A0 ATA Device (4) Generic- Compact Flash USB Device (5) Generic- MS/MS-Pro USB Device (6) Generic- SD/MMC USB Device (7) Generic- SM/xD-Picture USB
PSU
500w Corsair
Case
Cooler Master
Cooling
3 Fans
Keyboard
Logitech MK300
Mouse
Logitech WOM
Internet Speed
75Mb
Antivirus
Norton 360
Browser
Firefox, Opera, IE
Well I have done a test with half a dozen jpeg all at 12 level of compression and I can't see any difference at all in the quality when in Win 7 or XP. The images were from RAW files, post processed in PS Elements 6 all sized the same and saved to JPEG level 12.
It should be the situation, John !
Probably he started with a file that is of poor quality.
 

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Assembled
OS
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Insider Preview 64-bit
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. B85M-D3H
Memory
Corsair Vengence 4GB x2 (8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz)
Graphics Card(s)
2047MB GeForce GTS 450 (ZOTAC International)
Sound Card
Onboard (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Monitor(s) Displays
LG Flatron E2040T
Screen Resolution
1600x900
Hard Drives
Western Digital 1 TB
Seagate 500 GB
PSU
Corsair VS550
Case
Cooler Master K380
Cooling
Cooler Master Seidon 120V Plus
Keyboard
Logitech MK260r
Mouse
Logitech MK260r
Internet Speed
PMPL Broadband
Antivirus
Windows Defender + MBAM
Browser
Firefox
Other Info
Dell Studio 15" Laptop
I've noticed that zooming in Windows 7 Photo Viewer makes images very pixelated and jagged. No problem zooming on the same pics in XP (dual boot machine). Perhaps a related issue?
 

My Computer

OS
Windows 7
Well I've had a look and I can't see the difference (apart from "outlook" trying to resize/compress images) I've done some test's (see image) and the file size/ compression ratio is the same between xp,vista and Win7 I'm a bit :confused:
Posted both jpeg and png just to double check, but I see no difference ;)
 

Attachments

  • quality1.png
    quality1.png
    470.8 KB · Views: 20
  • quality2.jpg
    quality2.jpg
    251.9 KB · Views: 19

My Computer

Computer type
PC/Desktop
Computer Manufacturer/Model Number
Self Built
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU
AMD Phenom Quad core 9950 black edition
Motherboard
Gigabyte
Memory
16Gb
Graphics Card(s)
2x XFX Radeon 5850
Sound Card
PCI Express X-Fi Titanium / Logitech G35
Monitor(s) Displays
2x HP 2410i
Screen Resolution
1920x1080
Hard Drives
2x 500Gb Seagate
1x 300Gb Seagate
1x 1Tb Seagate
2x 1Tb Hitatchi
PSU
Jean Tech Storm 700W
Case
Cooler Master COSMOS S
Cooling
Akasa Evo Blue Pro
Keyboard
Logitech G15
Mouse
Mad Catz M.M.O. 7
Internet Speed
12mb
I see what you're getting at, but it has nothing to do with the quality of the actual photo. If it did, XP would display it just as poorly.
Just so that I get my head round this problem as I have only just got to this thread. Are you saying that if you create a jpeg at a certain size and compression, if you view that in "a program" in Windows 7 then boot into XP in the same machine, use the same program and image file then the XP view looks better quality than the Win 7?

Correct. Using the same default windows photo viewer in both XP and Win 7, Win 7 shows a poorer and more pixelated image when zoomed as compared to xp when zoomed at the same level.
 

My Computer

OS
XP / Win7 x64 Pro
CPU
Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard
Asus P5-E
Memory
2x2GB GSkill DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA)
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2408WFP
Screen Resolution
1920x1200
Well I have done a test with half a dozen jpeg all at 12 level of compression and I can't see any difference at all in the quality when in Win 7 or XP. The images were from RAW files, post processed in PS Elements 6 all sized the same and saved to JPEG level 12.
It should be the situation, John !
Probably he started with a file that is of poor quality.

Nope. If the file was poor quality, it would show poorly on both systems, which it does not - only in Win 7 do they appear blocky and pixelated upon zoom.
 

My Computer

OS
XP / Win7 x64 Pro
CPU
Intel Quad-Core Q9450 @ 3.2GHz
Motherboard
Asus P5-E
Memory
2x2GB GSkill DDR2
Graphics Card(s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS (EVGA)
Monitor(s) Displays
Dell 2408WFP
Screen Resolution
1920x1200
Back
Top