 | |
| |
| 23 Sep 2011 | #1 |
| | Discussion about hidden windows shares I'd like to get some opinions of the usefulness of hiding windows shares using sharename$ Is there really a point? Anyone with a medium size toolkit or even anyone using linux can see all hidden shares anyway. Working with hidden shares also impaires the use of some commands like "dsquery user OU=BlaBla,DC=rob,DC=roy,DC=com" | dsmod user -hmdir \\srvr\users$\$username$" |
My System Specs | |
| 23 Sep 2011 | #2 |
| | For home users, they're not very useful. For Domain environments, they're used daily. There are certain folders you generally hide from curious eyes. DACLS cannot be modified in admin shares, sysvol/netlogons are a couple of examples of folders that must remain hidden. |
| My System Specs |
| 23 Sep 2011 | #3 |
| | Those hidden shares are only accessible if the attacker has the correct authentication details. Otherwise, nothing to fear. |
| My System Specs |
| . |
| |
 |
Discussion about hidden windows shares problems?
« Wireless doesn't have valid ip configuration
|
How to suppress Unknown Publisher question without turning off UAC? »
| Thread Tools | |
| Similar help and support threads for: Discussion about hidden windows shares | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How to see hidden text or hidden streams in a doc(x) file in Starter | Microsoft Office | |||
| My pc is not showing Hidden Folders even after enabling - "Show Hidden | Performance & Maintenance | |||
| Hidden Shares | Network & Sharing | |||
| Remove windows 7 CD/DVD-ROM automatic hidden shares ? | Network & Sharing | |||
| why is there not a windows 7 64-bit discussion group? | Chillout Room | |||
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.
