 | |
| |
| 07 Apr 2010 | #41 |
| | Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss) Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 2ms |
My System Specs | |
| 07 Apr 2010 | #42 |
| | is mine any good? |
| My System Specs |
| 07 Apr 2010 | #43 |
| | Kari, Baarod, you are more experienced than the rest of us and we do appreciate the help. But for many of us Windows 7 is not working in a network environment. I have followed advice here, at MajorGeeks, looked up on tech net and still cannot get Windows 7 to work like XP did for file sharing. I assume when you first tried out Windows 7 you set it up to share with your other OS's and after a month or so made the decision it works. Same as I would do. Ask what you need to know and I will post it. Sites I have tried: How to Network Windows 7 Share Files and Printers between Windows 7 and XP - How-To Geek Windows XP and Windows 7 networking issues - Networking & Security and a few others. Logically I should be able to get a full map from the networking and Sharing window and set things up. Instead I have this computer, the switch and the gateway connected to the internet and a list of computers below under "the following device(s) can not be placed on the map". This is true on both Windows 7 computers. The XP computers show all devices correctly. So the Windows 7 computers can see the devices but not place them nor give any information but the XP computers can. All help appreciated. I should add I am file sharing effectively by typing in the IP or the name directly to the "search and command line" box in the start menu. Last edited by Duke of Alinor; 07 Apr 2010 at 08:59 AM.. Reason: completeness |
| My System Specs |
| . |
| |
| 07 Apr 2010 | #44 |
| | 
Quote: Originally Posted by baarod 
Quote: Originally Posted by Kari What is a reasonable test period at home before 'putting all eggs in the same basket', as you say? I've used Windows 7 almost a year and a half now on two computers, about a year when I finally decided to install it on all rigs at home. At work, the network has a Vista rig, two XP's, a Mandriva Linux and some Sevens. Absolutely no problems to setup and maintain. We have successfully set up computers with Seven to customer's networks using different OS's. I still fail to understand how I am out of touch with reality. If you have some problems, it's only your reality. When experienced users don't have problems, I wouldn't call it to be out of touch with reality. Don't feel bad. I got slammed earlier. The best idea is just stop helping. We could modify Windows 7 P2P and Homegroup to each other from here to Europe and I don't think it would make a difference. The OP has a bone to pick with Windows 7 or MS and we can't help these folks! |
| My System Specs |
| 07 Apr 2010 | #45 |
| |
Quote: Originally Posted by antharr
Quote: Originally Posted by baarod
Quote: Originally Posted by Kari What is a reasonable test period at home before 'putting all eggs in the same basket', as you say? I've used Windows 7 almost a year and a half now on two computers, about a year when I finally decided to install it on all rigs at home. At work, the network has a Vista rig, two XP's, a Mandriva Linux and some Sevens. Absolutely no problems to setup and maintain. We have successfully set up computers with Seven to customer's networks using different OS's. I still fail to understand how I am out of touch with reality. If you have some problems, it's only your reality. When experienced users don't have problems, I wouldn't call it to be out of touch with reality. Don't feel bad. I got slammed earlier. The best idea is just stop helping. We could modify Windows 7 P2P and Homegroup to each other from here to Europe and I don't think it would make a difference. The OP has a bone to pick with Windows 7 or MS and we can't help these folks! |
| My System Specs |
 |
I think I have confirmed we ALL have W7, wi-fi issues problems?
| Thread Tools | |
| Similar help and support threads for: I think I have confirmed we ALL have W7, wi-fi issues | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Windows 8 New Logo Confirmed by Microsoft | News | |||
| IE9 confirmed for March 2010 | News | |||
| 7600.16385 is the confirmed final RTM.... | General Discussion | |||
| Huray GTA IV confirmed working | Gaming | |||
| Confirmed: Office 2010 will come in 32-bit, 64-bit | News | |||
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.
