
Quote: Originally Posted by
madtownidiot
a lot of the software market is artificially sustained in the first place because hardware manufacturers are subsidized by microsoft and 3rd party software companies who pay them to install trial software.
It all happens because consumers want the absolute lowest price they can get for anything and thus deal with the trialware as it does get them the box for a reduced price. The question is whether it's worth the savings. I would personally pay a few bucks extra to get it clean...but most people would not feel the same way...and thus vendors and such simply don't offer it. Look how hard it is to get a clean Windows install disc out of the deal...they always want you to restore back to their factory image (of course, I see where this helps them during the warranty phase and such where the base installs are the same).

Quote: Originally Posted by
madtownidiot
Most applications have open source equivalents that work just as well but are only available in linux, but I know for a fact that most major personal computer manufacturers don't offer linux as an OS option because Microsoft would yank their manufacturers' license to install windows if they did.
I think that many of the great open source apps are available in both Windows and Linux. I'm sure there are some which are not available. It is sad that contracts with Microsoft do preclude people's ability to purchase other OS's installed...but being a linux user myself, I realize the mass market doesn't really want it anyway..so it doesn't bother me in the least that I have to install it myself. What does bother me, is that I struggle to buy a machine retail with no OS and get it for a few dollars less. Seems dumb to "have" to pay for Windows, when I have no intention of using it. But that's what self building machines is for.

Quote: Originally Posted by
kylehimself
pparks1 I've read most of your posts here. You must understand that piracy is subject to opinion. There are plenty of musicians, actors and so on out there who advocate file sharing.
Yes, there are some and some of them even give their stuff away on their websites. I have no problems with this type of file sharing.

Quote: Originally Posted by
kylehimself
Hypothetically if I buy an album and want to send it to friend why shouldn't I? I paid for it. If I want to give it to multiple friends why shouldn't I?
While this might be a little iffy in the legal sense, I don't see a huge issue with it. Should your friends copy it...probably not. But if they just listen to it or watch it..I don't see the difference between you inviting them over to your house and listening and watching. But giving it away to just anybody in the world, that is a much different animal.

Quote: Originally Posted by
kylehimself
You said about Adobe charging for Photoshop and how maybe they would charge less for it if everybody stopped pirating and bought it. You best believe they wouldn't.
I said, if people stopped pirating photoshop and instead got behind other project like The Gimp (or any other thing), and this other solution really took off, became very feature rich and easier to use with a much lower pricetag than Photoshop...then Adobe might take notice and make some changes.