|19 Oct 2010||#1|
| || |
Does Microsoft really need a chief software architect?
Ray Ozzie announced yesterday that he plans to step down as Microsoft’s Chief Software Architect, after five years at the company.
The question for Microsoft now is not “Can Ozzie be replaced?” Instead, they should be asking whether the company needs a chief architect at all.
Trying to assess Ozzie’s impact on Microsoft is tricky. He joined Microsoft in 2005 as the designated successor for Bill Gates. The company made it official the next year, giving him the Chief Software Architect title when Gates stepped down from full-time duties at Microsoft. But as my colleague Mary Jo Foley noted last year, Ozzie wasn’t exactly a drop-in replacement for Gates. He “hasn’t found it easy fitting in culturally in Microsoft’s dog-eat-dog culture,” she noted, accurately. Aside from a few keynote appearances, Ozzie has been almost invisible as a public face of Microsoft. And behind the scenes, I cannot remember ever talking to a Microsoft developer or manager who brought up Ozzie’s name as a source of inspiration or ideas.
|My System Specs|
|Similar help and support threads for2: Does Microsoft really need a chief software architect?|
|Sony DVD Architect will not open||Software|
|cd architect crashing||Software|
|Multicore requires OS rework, Windows architect advises||News|
|Apple's temporary chief gets bonus......? $22M.||Chillout Room|
|MS's security chief suggests 'Net tax to clean computer||News|
|Praveen - Sharepoint Architect||Installation & Setup|
|Microsoft Chief Executive: Windows 7 Is Whole Lot Better Windows Vista.||News|
|Our Sites ||Site Links ||About Us ||Find Us |
© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.