New
#50
Thanks for letting me know how things work. So if it says for example BUILD_7600_ABCDEFGH on the one you posted, and it says BUILD_7600_ABCDEFGH, then everything is set? There's nothing included in the RTM that wasn't in the leak?
Thanks for letting me know how things work. So if it says for example BUILD_7600_ABCDEFGH on the one you posted, and it says BUILD_7600_ABCDEFGH, then everything is set? There's nothing included in the RTM that wasn't in the leak?
Some ask if the next version IE will be part of SP1. Once both are out I'll simply end up with a second image one with 9 and SP1 along with the latest 8 and no SP1 as the RC still refused to go on the 64bit through the MS updates.
I found that a bit odd never having seen any problems installing any SP in the past. With Vista I ran the beta from day #1 straight through to the rtm release for six months on the previous version without a hiccup of any type. Hopefully they got part ironed out for the 22nd.
I could swear any in the past have at least created their own. Maybe I'm wrong. That'll teach me to mirror the drive(s) in future.
The SP didn't create a single RP for itself, that is odd, they should have left a single RP for the SP installation.