Think upgrade path. Over the last few years, those running AMD systems could simply drop in a new quad, and recently, hexcore, without upgrading their board, or Ram.
Fair enough, and I will be honest, I don't usually consider upgrades as I never upgrade my CPU. Instead, I buy a whole new kit and then re-purpose and rotate the running machines in my house. I just figure if my mainboard is 2 years old, Idon't want to just dump in the latest CPU and have outdated equipment in other areas.
I find AMD still superior > performance-per watt-per dollar. My 1100T is $199, there's nothing it can't do, and an i5 could never render or multi-task as well, costs more and requires all new parts around it. It's no surprise AMD is the gamers choice, and surprising as it is, tons of benchmarks show AMD superior at extreme resolutions.
I disagree that a Core i5 2500K could NEVER render of multitask as well as an 1100T BE. Just because the 1100T has more cores, doesn't necessarily dictate it will always multitask well. Here is a nice comparison showing which chip actually performs better in a variety of areas; and they do flip flop back and forth.
AnandTech - Bench - CPU
Sure, if you already have all of the core pieces of an AMD system and simply have to put in a CPU, it's cheaper than buying a whole Intel rig from the ground up. But for somebody who is coming into a new box without anything else, I don't see the "massive savings of going the AMD route" as we did years ago. I mean, when I was younger, you used to save $400+ on an AMD rig and it performed 85% as well. Nowadays, there just isn't this big price difference.
As far as AMD being the "gamers choice", I believe that to be wholeheartedly true during the AMD Athlon 64 X2 days...as it was my choice as well. But most gamers that I know today, are all running C2D's, or Corei7's (both previous gen and Sandy Bridge)...as Intel has been spanking AMD for the past 5 years. At work, I tried to spec out a low cost gaming box for somebody and used an AMD chip and my gaming coworkers were like, "AMD???? Why on earth would you recommend that these days?" I said, in order to stay under $900 for the entire build, I had to. Had that constraint been lifted, I would have not gone that route. They said, "well, If it were me, I would simply wait a while longer and save some more cash". So, not all gamers universally seem to agree that AMD is the superior choice.
I hope the 8130p and Llano APU (Zacate will without a doubt be a nightmare for Intel, they absolutely can no longer compete with AMD in the mobile space, not even close) cause serious problems for Intel, after reading and discovering what I'd always suspected.
Still waiting to see that. For me, on mobile platforms, I want quiet, cool and LONG battery life. Intel has dominated the low battery usage for years and years.
I'll never, ever buy an Intel product.
Gotcha, so I see you are a fanboy of AMD to the core (pun intended). To me, I don't have brand loyalty when it comes to computers. I go with whatever is best in my opinion at the time. By not even considering Intel, I think you sell yourself short and have to compromise. I'm not saying you are wrong to feel the way you do, but it certainly does make having an open and frank discussion somewhat moot as you won't see both sides of the story.
I've owned both Intel and AMD over the years. Had a number of AMD K62 boxes, I have a Sempron 2800+ currently running my file server, and currently still have an Athlon 64 X2 4400+ running my linux desktop. My build from 2 years ago, was a Core 2 Quad and I have a couple of Intel SSD drives...which are awesome. So, while I might not agree with all Intel business ethics and decisions, I sure do like some of their products.
And trust me, if Bulldozer comes out and kicks absolute butt, I will in no way hesitate from recommending them to friends, gamers, and family alike. I wouldn't hesitate for 1 second to use one in a build for myself. Just gotta wait and see what performance really is, what the mainboards are really like and what the price is at the end of the day. I don't mind 1 bit even paying MORE for AMD over Intel, as long as it outperforms it.