Andy pretty much said it all.

Hi there
C'mon guys

-- I know this is W7 Forum but have you guys actually TRIED W8. There is a horrible metro interface you can get round but the O/S isn't as bad as you appear to make out --and security for one beats W7 hands down

-- read on how the memory heap is handled in W8 -- the memory heap stuff in W7 and previous releases was everybody's keys to the kingdom -- any course on Hacking 101 will point out that original massive defect in Windows security --but it's been fixed now. (What they would do was force a memory heap overflow into a buffer --then from there any half way even amateur hacker could do all sorts of nasty stuff).

Finally in W8 Ms has closed this defect.

cheers
jimbo

I used, got tired of it. Probably will stick with 7 until 9.

"The Windows 8 kernel is not fundamentally changing any of the algorithms" used in Windows 7, he said. "It's more of a hardened version of Windows 7 … [in that] you don't have any significant structur[al] changes, but you have a lot more checks." http://redmondmag.com

Considering I have had less than one damaging infection per decade in my over 40 years of programming/using computers, I want to have a more valuable reason than "a lot more checks" to switch to Windows 8. Vista had a lot more checks than Windows XP. A lot of good that did. They were so annoying that most people turned them off. Nagging simply does not work!

The major vulnerability to hacking your system is the human that is between the monitor and the keyboard/mouse/touch screen. No amount of increased checking will fix that one. Follow the long published simple rules of safe computing and your troubles will be few and far between. Keep a current backup and you will be able to recover from the few that do happen.

The bottom line is there is no lasting protection from sloth, ignorance, and stupidity.

I don't like anything about Windows 8 so far. From what I've seen and tested, it's just Win7 plus the iPhone menu minus an usable interface, but no significant improvements or changes. Essentially, it will be running the very same kernel from Vista (the Windows 6.x family) with minor and very annoying visual modifications. So far, I have no reason to go for it.

Does anyone know of a significant change on it? (besides the metro-crap of course)
Or even a minor change?

Even in a tablet, that realm is really dominated by Android and Mac, I doubt Windows can go well there.