Mozilla juices Firefox's JavaScript with IonMonkey

    Mozilla juices Firefox's JavaScript with IonMonkey


    Posted: 12 Sep 2012
    Mozilla has begun building a new technology called IonMonkey into Firefox to improve its JavaScript performance.

    High JavaScript performance is essential in today's hotly competitive browser market, because JavaScript is the language behind complicated Web sites and Web apps such as Google Docs and Facebook. IonMonkey has now been packaged into the "nightly" version of Firefox 18 for hardcore developers; that version is scheduled to become the mainstream version of the browser early in 2013.
    Read more at source:
    Mozilla juices Firefox's JavaScript with IonMonkey | Internet & Media - CNET News
    Brink's Avatar Posted By: Brink
    12 Sep 2012



  1. Posts : 562
    Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1
       #1

    IE better need to catch up. Its javascript performance is getting slower and slower compared to rapid release updates from Mozilla and Chromium.
      My Computer

  2.    #2

    I've noticed the difference in JavaScript performance between Internet Explorer and Firefox/Chrome to be increasing, with Google and Mozilla leading the way in performance.

    One question, which keeps returning to my mind, is Google Chrome faster or is Mozilla Firefox faster?
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 552
    Windows 8 Pro x64
       #3

    I ran SunSpider 0.9.1 on both browsers. From is Chrome, To is Firefox.

    Also, anyone interested in the Firefox 18 nightly can get it here:
    http://nightly.mozilla.org/

    Code:
    TEST                   COMPARISON            FROM                 TO             DETAILS
    
    =============================================================================
    
    ** TOTAL **:           ??                237.4ms +/- 16.9%   241.8ms +/- 1.6%     not conclusive: might be *1.019x as slow*
    
    =============================================================================
    
      3d:                  ??                 34.6ms +/- 19.4%    41.9ms +/- 7.1%     not conclusive: might be *1.21x as slow*
        cube:              ??                 11.9ms +/- 36.7%    16.3ms +/- 12.1%     not conclusive: might be *1.37x as slow*
        morph:             -                  10.0ms +/- 15.4%     9.0ms +/- 15.9% 
        raytrace:          *1.31x as slow*    12.7ms +/- 9.9%    16.6ms +/- 3.0%     significant
    
      access:              -                  24.8ms +/- 41.3%    19.1ms +/- 4.1% 
        binary-trees:      -                   2.9ms +/- 84.1%     2.4ms +/- 15.4% 
        fannkuch:          1.115x as fast      8.7ms +/- 4.0%     7.8ms +/- 3.9%     significant
        nbody:             -                   9.7ms +/- 73.4%     4.4ms +/- 8.4% 
        nsieve:            *1.29x as slow*     3.5ms +/- 22.1%     4.5ms +/- 8.4%     significant
    
      bitops:              -                  17.0ms +/- 22.6%    14.0ms +/- 5.4% 
        3bit-bits-in-byte: -                   1.2ms +/- 25.1%     1.0ms +/- 0.0% 
        bits-in-byte:      *1.21x as slow*     4.2ms +/- 7.2%     5.1ms +/- 4.4%     significant
        bitwise-and:       *1.167x as slow*    3.6ms +/- 10.3%     4.2ms +/- 17.6%     significant
        nsieve-bits:       2.16x as fast       8.0ms +/- 45.0%     3.7ms +/- 9.3%     significant
    
      controlflow:         *1.154x as slow*    2.6ms +/- 14.2%     3.0ms +/- 0.0%     significant
        recursive:         *1.154x as slow*    2.6ms +/- 14.2%     3.0ms +/- 0.0%     significant
    
      crypto:              *1.147x as slow*   19.0ms +/- 12.8%    21.8ms +/- 3.4%     significant
        aes:               *1.47x as slow*     7.0ms +/- 15.2%    10.3ms +/- 4.7%     significant
        md5:               *1.34x as slow*     5.6ms +/- 8.9%     7.5ms +/- 5.0%     significant
        sha1:              1.60x as fast       6.4ms +/- 18.4%     4.0ms +/- 8.4%     significant
    
      date:                *1.61x as slow*    23.2ms +/- 27.5%    37.3ms +/- 3.8%     significant
        format-tofte:      *1.56x as slow*    11.8ms +/- 25.3%    18.4ms +/- 4.2%     significant
        format-xparb:      *1.66x as slow*    11.4ms +/- 31.9%    18.9ms +/- 3.8%     significant
    
      math:                ??                 19.7ms +/- 32.5%    20.5ms +/- 3.8%     not conclusive: might be *1.041x as slow*
        cordic:            *1.167x as slow*    3.0ms +/- 11.2%     3.5ms +/- 10.8%     significant
        partial-sums:      ??                 13.2ms +/- 45.4%    13.8ms +/- 3.3%     not conclusive: might be *1.045x as slow*
        spectral-norm:     -                   3.5ms +/- 17.4%     3.2ms +/- 9.4% 
    
      regexp:              *1.30x as slow*    10.5ms +/- 9.8%    13.7ms +/- 3.5%     significant
        dna:               *1.30x as slow*    10.5ms +/- 9.8%    13.7ms +/- 3.5%     significant
    
      string:              1.22x as fast      86.0ms +/- 14.7%    70.5ms +/- 1.6%     significant
        base64:            -                   5.9ms +/- 36.3%     5.3ms +/- 6.5% 
        fasta:             1.52x as fast      11.7ms +/- 20.4%     7.7ms +/- 11.6%     significant
        tagcloud:          -                  23.8ms +/- 9.7%    21.7ms +/- 1.6% 
        unpack-code:       -                  30.2ms +/- 14.3%    26.0ms +/- 2.6% 
        validate-input:    1.47x as fast      14.4ms +/- 21.2%     9.8ms +/- 4.6%     significant
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 402
    Vista Home Premium, contemplating moving to Linux
       #4

    I have FF13... it looks too much like IE, which I don't care for. Maybe someday Mozilla will wake up and stop trying to make an IE clone. Yeah, I'm opinionated.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 87
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
       #5

    Firefox has improved a lot in the 18 nightly builds, but yes, its JavaScript speed is still the Achilles heel.


    x BlueRobot said:
    I've noticed the difference in JavaScript performance between Internet Explorer and Firefox/Chrome to be increasing, with Google and Mozilla leading the way in performance.

    One question, which keeps returning to my mind, is Google Chrome faster or is Mozilla Firefox faster?
    Google Chrome as for now is currently not only faster than Firefox, but faster than anything, at least in my computer. Compared with IE10, Opera 12.50, Safari 5, and Firefox 18 nightly, in many tests and regular browsing.

    Chrome -> IE10 -> Opera 12.50 -> Firefox.


    JimJoe said:
    I have FF13... it looks too much like IE, which I don't care for. Maybe someday Mozilla will wake up and stop trying to make an IE clone. Yeah, I'm opinionated.
    Almost all browsers have now very similar GUIs.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:57.
Find Us