New
#1
Thats just outrageous, glad i havent got an account
You've got to be kidding me...
Instagram says it now has the right to sell your photos | Politics and Law - CNET NewsInstagram said today that it has the perpetual right to sell users' photographs without payment or notification, a dramatic policy shift that quickly sparked a public outcry.
The new intellectual property policy, which takes effect on January 16, comes three months after Facebook completed its acquisition of the popular photo-sharing site. Unless Instagram users delete their accounts before the January deadline, they cannot opt out.
there should be a mass deletion of photos in accounts after backing up then a mass upload of photos of arses from millions of people across the planet.
how much will they get for a pic of my arse?
Could one preemptively copyright all their photos on Instagram and charge 'em an arm and a leg?
No, Instagram can't sell your photos: what the new terms of service really mean | The VergeNo, Instagram can't sell your photos: what the new terms of service really mean
Update, December 18 at 2:50 p.m. PT: Instagram has backed down, as we report in this CNET article posted a few minutes ago. Instagram says it will "remove" the language that caused a user revolt over the last day.
Instagram said today that it has the perpetual right to sell users' photographs without payment or notification, a dramatic policy shift that quickly sparked a public outcry.Instagram apologizes to users: We won't sell your photos | Internet & Media - CNET NewsInstagram apologized to its users today, saying it will "remove" language from its legal terms that would have let it sell users' photos or use them in advertisements.
In a blog post this afternoon, Chief Executive Kevin Systrom said it's "our mistake that this language is confusing" and that the company is "working on updated language."
"Since making these changes, we've heard loud and clear that many users are confused and upset about what the changes mean," he wrote.
Instagram's terms of use agreement announced yesterday sparked a user revolt unprecedented in its history -- and prompted competitors to tout their own services as more user-protective. It came three months after Facebook completed its acquisition of the popular photo-sharing service, which has over 100 million users, and follows recent efforts by the social network to increase revenue.
Still wouldn't trust them.
They may make it more confusing and still sell your photos.Chief Executive Kevin Systrom said it's "our mistake that this language is confusing" and that the company is "working on updated language."
I guarantee that most of the people who are freaking out about this, are the same people who illegally download music/games/movies. #HypocrisyIsFun
My friend uses this when we go out to capture our moments having fun if this is the case I'm going to tell him to stop using it
That is a big violation of rights ,Maybe should take a look at there fine print before making an account it should state that somewhere before signing up or during that process and give people a choice if yes or no if they want them shared
Also if it is a free service they are making money off of you and get no return pretty evil if you ask me