Windows 7 Forums

Welcome to Windows 7 Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find support and solutions for any problems regarding your Windows 7 PC be it Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a custom build. We also provide an extensive Windows 7 tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.


Windows 7: Intel: Nehalem Performance

04 Nov 2008   #1
Bare Foot Kid
Microsoft MVP

W 7 64-bit Ultimate
 
 
Intel: Nehalem Performance

Intel lifts curtain on Nehalem performance (hint: it's fast)!

Intel's Nehalem (Core i7, if you prefer the official brand name) has been one of the most-anticipated computer products of 2008 and, as of this morning... it's still one of the most anticipated products of 2008. Intel isn't launching the Core i7 yet—that will come later this month—but the company is allowing online and print publications to give a prelaunch look at the chip's performance. Those of you with significant others might actually find this is something of a boon, as it gives you plenty of time to come up with a reason why she should want a faster computer this Christmas.

Nehalem is officially the "tock" of Intel's processor cycle and the company's second and last 45nm architecture refresh before it launches Westmere and Sandy Bridge, both of which will be built on a 32nm process. What we have in the image below is an excellent representation of Intel's manufacturing and design cycle, but a poor representation of what Nehalem is and what it means for Intel. Strictly speaking, Nehalem's core architecture is a direct descent of (and an improvement upon) Penryn—a "tock" in other words. Evaluated as a platform, though, Nehalem is much more than a Penryn-follow-up. Starting now, (technically, in a few weeks), Intel is changing the way its microprocessors do business, and the company's shift has significant implications for the entire computing industry.

It's the interconnects, stupid.

Part of the reason the PC community has anticipated Nehalem so hotly lies within three magic words: integrated memory controller. AMD didn't invent the concept of an on-die memory controller but, until Sunnyvale launched Opteron/Athlon 64 back in 2003, the PC enthusiast community wasn't generally familiar with the performance benefits that this a solution could deliver. When K8 debuted, sporting both a fancy new interconnect (HyperTransport) and a new memory controller, bolted directly to the processor and running at full processor speed, the results were extraordinary; the company moved from also-ran to serious competitor in a single stroke.

Up until now, Intel has avoided this move, choosing instead to rely upon the GTL+ bus specification that it first debuted in the days of the Pentium Pro. Intel's decision to continue using the comparatively ancient GTL+ bus over the past five years gave AMD an edge in certain performance scenarios, and reduced Opteron's need for a large, expensive L2 (or L2/L3) cache. AMD's superior interconnect technology has remained an important bullet point on the company's list of reasons why potential customers should choose Opteron but, as of today, that particular playing field is level. Starting with Nehalem, Intel is debuting both a triple-channel integrated memory controller (take THAT, AMD), and a point-to-point protocol of its own, dubbed QuickPath Interconnect (QPI). The entire launch platform, complete with gratuitous numerical pornography is shown below.

The X58 Express is a two-chip northbridge/southbridge solution, but only the X58 IOH (I/O Hub) is actually a new part. That's an approach that makes good sense for Intel, and the ICH10/ICH10R solution that partners with the X58 IOH is as full-featured a chip as one could ask for. The X58 IOH supports up to 36 PCIe 2.0 lanes (or up to 4x8 configurations), and interfaces with the Core i7 processor via a 25.6GB/s QPI connection. AMD's HyperTransport 3.0 still has an advantage here—the HT 3.0 standard provides up to 41.6GB/s of bi-directional bandwidth—but Intel's QPI offers up to twice the 12.8GB/s of bandwidth of the X48 chipset, and supports full-duplex transport instead of the half-duplex limitation of the GTL+ bus. If there's a downside to the X58 Express, it lies solely in the chipset's lack of support for any sort of legacy peripherals—no PS/2, no IDE, no serial ports, no parallel ports, zip, zadda, zilch. Motherboard manufacturers may opt to provide some of these features via third-party solutions.

Read more at the source.


Later Ted


My System SpecsSystem Spec
.
08 Nov 2008   #2
NormCameron

Vista X32. Windows 7 32bit
 
 
i7 Superceded in Q2 2009

As we covered in our previous editorial, Intel would be launching the new Core i7-965 Extreme Edition, Core i7-940 and Core i7-920 processors at 9 am, Pacific Time, November 16, 2008. The three processors are expected to be superseded by faster processors in Q2, 2009.

Three speed grades of the future Intel Lynnfield processors are expected to be launched by Q3, 2009. There are no clock speed details of these three models right now, but here are some features of these Nehalem-based processors :

* Based on the Nehalem microarchitecture
* Uses the new LGA1160 socket
* Supports Intel Turbo Boost Technology
* Supports Intel Hyper-Threading Technology
* 4 Cores, 8 Threads
* 8 MB Intel SmartCache
* Integrated memory controller supporting two DDR3 channels
* Discrete graphics support for 1x16 or 2x8 PCI Express 2.0 slots

Not listed in the roadmap is the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 processor. It is scheduled to be released in December 2008. For more details, take a look here.

Tech ARP - Intel's Desktop CPU Roadmap @ October, 2008 Rev. 2.0
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

 Intel: Nehalem Performance




Thread Tools




Similar help and support threads
Thread Forum
Intel 520 SSD, low performance, high performance, then low again...?
I just now installed an Intel 520 240GB SSD. Measuring the performance, got strange results. First it did not at all perform close to my expectations and Intels promises:...
Hardware & Devices
Performance decrease if not using Intel software?
Hi. Recently resolved for the second time however on an entirely different machine, an issue wherein Windows Update without any clues refuses to work -- the problem this time was fixed by uninstalling the Intel Matrix Storage Manager. The first time (again, on another machine altogether) it...
Drivers
Intel i7 990x - a lot of performance
Source: New Intel Core i7 990X Extreme coming in September - Bright Side Of News* But apparently the shipment date is delayed to 2011. Rumor has it that they will present it at the CES Vegas fair in January.
Hardware & Devices
Intel I7 930 Performance. WOW
I have over-clocked it to 4Ghz with turbo OFF, HT ON and C-State On. I have several applications running, 1 game, google chrome, and downloading several software and gees, the thing doesn't even lag one compared to my old system! I am extremely happy with my purchase. I would recommend one...
Performance & Maintenance
6-core Nehalem coming to LGA 1366 this year
more..
Hardware & Devices
intel unveil native 8 core Nehalem
8 cores = 16 threads... :eek: could this be the first skt1567 chip...??? :)SK
Hardware & Devices


Our Sites

Site Links

About Us

Find Us

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:52.

Twitter Facebook Google+



Windows 7 Forums

Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App