Windows Activation Technologies Update for Windows 7

Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast

  1. Posts : 1,519
    El Capitan / Windows 10
       #120

    monkeys breath said:
    seekermeister said:
    This is one update that I shall NOT install.
    seekermeister said:
    That is one link that I could do without.
    jfar said:
    Nor me, on my four machines.
    omegatron said:
    Sorry Micorsoft. ET is going to have to use someone else's computer to phone home...
    i think we all agree ratepv needs to pull that link. no one wants it.
    It's a wonderful research tool. I've downloaded it onto a test box to see what it does... I KNOWINGLY have loaded a bad windows unto my CAT. If she begins behaving strangely, wants to use the telephone more than usual, won't use the little box (my CAT does not litter, she's green) then I'll call y'all from the linux side and tell how it all works. I will throw this out -- the CAT might not work outside the box unless we watch. I hope there's no gas -- ES
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 1,519
    El Capitan / Windows 10
       #121

    ratePV said:
    The update is already available to download:

    http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...tionUpdate.exe
    This is not the patch but a loader for it. It is kinda cute the way it works. So far after working on the drive I've seen a patch for loaders very similar to something else. I'm going offline for a few hours to see why some filbert would leave their shell in this thing...
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 108
    windows 7 ultimate x64
       #122

    funny, this update is not showing for me. not that i have any doubt
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1,519
    El Capitan / Windows 10
       #123

    hclarkjr said:
    funny, this update is not showing for me. not that i have any doubt
    It's not active yet see
    C:\Windows\system32\WUSA.exe" "C:\Users\asshut\AppData\Local\Temp\\{8c0f6a11-a22f-4bc0-bb99-561e2e098a06}.msu" /quiet /norestart

    with no msu correlation id it's a single shot

    Log Name: Setup
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-WUSA
    Date: why tellem?
    Event ID: 2
    Task Category: None
    Level: Information
    Keywords:
    User: yerputer/yew
    Computer: yerputer
    Description:
    Windows update "Update for Windows (KB971033)" was successfully installed. (Command line: ""C:\Windows\system32\WUSA.exe" "C:\Users\yew\AppData\Local\Temp\\{8c0f6a11-a22f-4bc0-bb99-561e2e098a06}.msu" /quiet /norestart")
    Event Xml:
    <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
    <System>
    <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-WUSA" Guid="{09608C12-C1DA-4104-A6FE-B959CF57560A}" />
    <EventID>2</EventID>
    <Version>0</Version>
    <Level>4</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Opcode>0</Opcode>
    <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2010-02-16T22:26:07.453518600Z" />
    <EventRecordID>147</EventRecordID>
    <Correlation /> NO CORRELATION <-
    <Execution ProcessID="4436" ThreadID="3848" />
    <Channel>Setup</Channel>
    <Computer>yerputer</Computer>
    <Security UserID="if you think this is funny..." />
    </System>
    <EventData>
    <Data Name="UpdateTitle">"Update for Windows (KB971033)"</Data>
    <Data Name="CommandLine">"C:\Windows\system32\WUSA.exe" "C:\Users\yerputer\AppData\Local\Temp\\{8c0f6a11-a22f-4bc0-bb99-561e2e098a06}.msu" /quiet /norestart</Data>
    </EventData>
    </Event>

    It's not started without the next one...
    Last edited by baarod; 16 Feb 2010 at 17:52. Reason: more info
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 524
    Windows 7 SP1 x64
       #124

    HINT: You can manually start it from the task scheduler-windows-windows activation technologies-and run the validationtask.

    Edit: or you can validate it on the MS site-it uses the same method and database.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
       #125

    The thing that I find "interesting" is that anyone would even consider the possibility of installing this update for any reason. There is no "extra" that MS could offer me that would make me even think twice about accepting this. I expect that sooner or later, they will repackage this spybot either under a different kb # or stick it inside of something else that we are accustomed to...without telling even that writer of the OP's article. I hope that someone develops a scanner to detect it or a network detection device that would block it.

    I really do not care about any claims that MS is just looking out for "our" welfare, and even if they were only doing this for their own, it wouldn't take long before this would probably have even greater ramications. MS could extend their scope of operations to becoming the spybot capitol for every other software manufacturer interested in protecting their interests. This is almost as bad as DRM, and potentially far worse.

    EDIT: Definition MS = Malicious Software
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 108
    windows 7 ultimate x64
       #126

    eventually they will make you install it to get the other critical updates. if memory serves they did the same with XP??
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
       #127

    hclarkjr said:
    eventually they will make you install it to get the other critical updates. if memory serves they did the same with XP??
    If that happens, then I will disable updates altogether, and if that creates too much of a problem, I will uninstall the OS. I have no idea of what you are speaking of in reference to XP. There is nothing that I'm aware of that would prevent a person from accessing XP updates, except basic activation, and even that only applied to certain updates. Many updates are availablle via regular download without even having to validate for the download.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 108
    windows 7 ultimate x64
       #128

    seekermeister said:
    hclarkjr said:
    eventually they will make you install it to get the other critical updates. if memory serves they did the same with XP??
    If that happens, then I will disable updates altogether, and if that creates too much of a problem, I will uninstall the OS. I have no idea of what you are speaking of in reference to XP. There is nothing that I'm aware of that would prevent a person from accessing XP updates, except basic activation, and even that only applied to certain updates. Many updates are availablle via regular download without even having to validate for the download.
    i am talking about WGA when they started that for XP i believe it was not mandatory but if you did not install it you could not get critical updates
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 6,618
    W7x64 Pro, SuSe 12.1/** W7 x64 Pro, XP MCE
       #129

    hckarkjr,

    I guess that would depend on how you define "critical". It has been my experience that the updates that were not available without WGA were more in the order of added features. Things that I would deem as critical are available without validation.
      My Computer


 
Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41.
Find Us