|17 Jul 2010||#1|
| || |
Malware > The Stuxnet Sting
For the past week or so, we've been closely tracking a new family of threats called Stuxnet (a name derived from some of the filename/strings in the malware - mrxcls.sys, mrxnet.sys). In the past few days, it has become a popular topic of discussion amongst security researchers and in the media. First and foremost, we have recently released one additional signature for this threat, and urge our readers to be sure that you've got the latest anti-malware definition updates installed.
Prevalence and distribution
In terms of numbers of attacks, the most reports are coming from the US, Indonesia, India, and Iran. When you factor in the number of MMPC monitored machines along with the number that are reporting attacks, the US falls further down the list, giving way to Iran and Indonesia with attack attempts far higher than the global average.
Figure 1: Geographic saturation of Stuxnet infection attempts
Although the number of new machines reporting an infection attempt has remained constant at around a thousand per day, the number of attempts (tries per machine) has increased over the past few days:
Figure 2: Threat prevalence
In addition to these attack attempts, about 13% of the detections we’ve witnessed appear to be email exchange or downloads of sample files from hacker sites. Some of these detections have been picked up in packages that supposedly contain game cheats (judging by the name of the file).
What is unique about Stuxnet is that it utilizes a new method of propagation. Specifically, it takes advantage of specially-crafted shortcut files (also known as .lnk files) placed on USB drives to automatically execute malware as soon as the .lnk file is read by the operating system. In other words, simply browsing to the removable media drive using an application that displays shortcut icons (like Windows Explorer) runs the malware without any additional user interaction. We anticipate other malware authors taking advantage of this technique. Stuxnet will infect any usb drive that is attached to the system, and for this reason we’ve classified the malware as a worm. This classification for the malware should not be confused with another vector used by this worm, the newly disclosed vulnerability (CVE-2010-2568) covered in today’s advisory. The vulnerability itself is not wormable.
The Stuxnet Sting - Microsoft Malware Protection Center - Site Home - TechNet Blogs
|My System Specs|
|Similar help and support threads for2: Malware > The Stuxnet Sting|
|Excel 2010 - how to match sting of data?||Microsoft Office|
|Son of Stuxnet||Security News|
|Stuxnet 2.0? Researchers find new 'cyber-surveillance' malware threat||Security News|
|Stuxnet: the exhaustive 'final word' ?||Security News|
|Stuxnet: Anatomy of a Computer Virus||Security News|
|Is Stuxnet the 'best' malware ever?||News|
|Our Sites ||Site Links ||About Us ||Find Us |
© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.