Windows 7 Forums


Windows 7: Would a 1.44 CPU VCORE be too much?

26 Jan 2013   #21

Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit sp1
Laguna Hills Southern California
 
 

Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Erick Aguilar View Post
Quote   Quote: Originally Posted by Solarstarshines View Post
I would say that is accurate because the lower the TDP the higher the temp it can max

Im running 125w socket chip my temps top at 61c but during stability test i got to 53c max which means i have more room but i was happy with what i got when overclocking

I also come to the conclunsion we have the same architecture as well
Hm.. I wonder how that one guy who claimed his CPU reached 90C managed to post from his computer. I'm guessing 90C would have caused some serious damage.

Have to remember not everyone will achieve the same results and we really don't know how long this person has ran that chip at that kind of speed and heat

Best thing to do is get the best and stable results as possible if your board had issues going higher or throtling then you need to back off and be happy where you are because after a certain point it all feels the same

My System SpecsSystem Spec

Reply

 Would a 1.44 CPU VCORE be too much? problems?



Thread Tools



Similar help and support threads for: Would a 1.44 CPU VCORE be too much?
Thread Forum
Locking up computer - CPU Vcore experiencing massive fluctuation(33%) Hardware & Devices
OC q6600 - 1.18 vcore 333 x 9 = 3.0 ghz Overclocking and Case Mods
BSOD after waking from sleep due to drop in vcore BSOD Help and Support


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Seven Forums Android App Seven Forums IOS App Follow us on Facebook

Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd
  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32