New
#1
I have been quite succesfully running my AMD X6 1090T BE at 3.936GHZ, bearing in mind this on an AM2+ board being an M4N72-E.
Multi: X18
HT: 218.7Mhz
HT link: 2187Mhz
NB: 2616Mhz
Ram:8GB @ 872Mhz at 4-4-4-12-20 (2.1V) (4x2GB)
CPU Vcore: 1.456V
CPU-NB: 1.3V
Turbo disabled, Cool and Quiet and C1E enabled!
This gives me very reasonable results and as this is a video encoding machine, am quite pleased.
I have always seen that these chips can be pushed further at seemingly lower voltages and I yearn for 4.2Ghz which some people have managed to achieve.
The main reason I am writing this though is because I always found it so hard to get good information, it involved much trawling around and searching through various people's guides, and I had several BSOD along the way.
From what I have myself witnessed, I would like to offer a theory as to what some of these mean in lay man's terms when overclocking the AMD.
Common ones include:
Secondary Processor Clock Interupt
A problem has been detected and windows has shut down
An incorrectable hardware issue
All of these basically mean that you are going to far, either the processor has reached its limit and a core is shutting down, or its overheating. No matter what I tried, when I recieve these I couldn't push any futher, more voltage did not help.
By the way, the most worrying, an Incorrectable Hardware Issue, is correctable just not by Windows, the blind panic of thinking your CPU has failed totally is very disconcerting! Usual means voltage is wrong somewhere and Windows can't control it.
IRQL not less or equal
System Service exception
I believe this can be solved by adding CPU-NB voltage, it seems to be related to the communication between the HT link and the IMC(NB) on the chip, another reason this crops up is if your multipliers are too far apart it seems, it used to be that CPU-NB and the HT Link were linked together but now they can be unlinked, however if you set a CPU-NB multiplier that is more than 2 above the HT, this error seems to be thrown up, say 11X cpu-nb and 8X HT link.
This then can be corrected by keeping these together somewhat, obvioulsy people want to push the CPU-NB higher these days, but I found that sticking within 2 multipliers of the HT link kept the system stable, say 10X and 8X.
In the overclock I mention at the start, the CPU-NB multiplier was 12X and the HT link was 10X and this was stable, however if I pushed the CPU-NB up one more I would get an error.
Also you may recieve the system service error if you try to push the HT link too much past 2600Mhz which is the peak speed of HT3.0.
So far example when I tried matching my NB of 2616 with my HT link I would get a BSOD with system service exception.
Essentially the "system" or the motherboard in this case cannot handle what you are asking it to do.
On this board I have tired everything to get beyond 4Ghz and I have finally come to the conclusion that MY CPU cannot handle anything more.
My peak CPU case temp, is 57C under full load.
Thanks to my cooler it doesn't alter much even if I load 1.504V onto the Vcore, however even with this much extra voltage, I would always BSOD or would see a core fail while monitoring in Core Temp, anything above 4Ghz and the core fails on this particular CPU.
Assuming its not a power delivery error on the part of the VRM's on the board of course.
Anyway, my best overall clock after much more fiddling:
Multi: X16
HT: 250
HT Link: 2500Mhz
NB: 2750Mhz
Ram: 8GB @ 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15-20 (2.1V) (4x2GB)
Cpu Vcore: 1.488V
Cpu NB: 1.3V
Total Overclock is 4.0Ghz exactly and I will have to settle for that.
One other thing it seems that Windows Experience Index is very sensitive to bad Overclocks, it will BSOD if anything is wrong!
I now have :
CPU: 7.6
Ram: 7.7
Graphics: 7.9
Graphics: 7.9
Disk: 5.9
My disc is weak because it isnt an SSD as yet.
Hope this helps somebody, it may only be relevant to my board, and with the FX processors around, AMD people are moving on, although I hear that even the 8 core ones are struggling to beat X6 BE on a lot of benchmarks.
Oh well after passing lots of benchmarks, the last listed overclock failed intel burn test which i used after having a random BSOD after 2 hours of playing FSX.
So back to the drawing board:
Multi: x18
HT: 220
Ht Link: 2200
NB: 2659mhz
Ram: 8GB @ 880mhz at 4-4-4-12-18 DDR2 (2.1V) (4x2GB)
Cpu Vcore: 1.488v
Cpu NB: 1.220V
HT v: 1.3V
NB v: 1.4V
Turbo disabled, Cool and Quiet and C1E enabled!
Speed = 3.963ghz on all 6 cores
Intel Burn Test on MAXIMUM stable
In Core temp, I have adjusted the offset by 10 to give more accurate data, even with this addition, idles at 27C max temps in Intel Burn test MAXIMUM were 60C, but apparently the temps get more accurate when nearer the higher temp ranges so the offset imakes for a bad result really.
Last edited by Nomad8459; 15 Apr 2012 at 07:52. Reason: merged consecutive posts