Yep I guess I should of said flat screen t.v's
Until I saw the 60Hz on the one Greg posted I thought it was okay brand wise I've never heard about that one before.
I believe the minimum Hz for a t.v. refresh rate is 120 but of course 240Hz is best or higher if available and affordable.
Curious. I've been quite happy with the 60Hz refresh rate of my 32" TV.Yep I guess I should of said flat screen t.v's
Until I saw the 60Hz on the one Greg posted I thought it was okay brand wise I've never heard about that one before.
I believe the minimum Hz for a t.v. refresh rate is 120 but of course 240Hz is best or higher if available and affordable.
A lot of it is marketing hoo-ha. It is debatable whether humans can differentiate any difference over 60 Hz.
Of course, there are always some humans that can differentiate the tiniest differences in all manners of quality, provided the cost is high and the quality in question is pretentiously conspicuous.
Yep well a 32" t.v is very different,
Usually the difference is in fast moving movies....
But often more noticeable in larger screens past 40"
Signal plays a pretty good role too no doubt.
Yeah, 120Hz, 240Hz, etc. May see a difference on certain content, but otherwise. Scepter is a crap brand, but that size, for that price...If that's what you could afford, I'm sure it looks fine. A Guy
So many knockoff brands now days it's really just a crap shoot :)
If it lasts a year it's only a day or so
What is the best knockoff Bill :)
Vizio is the best of the newer brands. Haier and Hiscence after that I guess. I wouldn't buy any, I'd go Samsung, LG or maybe Sony. A Guy
I've owned only one Vizio (still use it) and I've been happy with it for the nearly six years I've had it.
Quote