i7 920 - video encoder using only 30% processor


  1. Posts : 15
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
       #1

    i7 920 - video encoder using only 30% processor


    Hi

    I wonder if anyone can tell me why when I encode video on my machine only 20 - 30% of processing power is used?

    I have attached a screen grab of Task Manager

    resources.jpg

    I am using FFMPEG to do the encoding via VUZE but Handbrake also gives me the same results.

    Also I'm using Windows 7 64bit Ultimate.

    Any help appreciated.

    Thanks

    giblet
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 28,845
    Win 8 Release candidate 8400
       #2

    giblet said:
    Hi

    I wonder if anyone can tell me why when I encode video on my machine only 20 - 30% of processing power is used?

    I have attached a screen grab of Task Manager

    resources.jpg

    I am using FFMPEG to do the encoding via VUZE but Handbrake also gives me the same results.

    Also I'm using Windows 7 64bit Ultimate.

    Any help appreciated.

    Thanks

    giblet
    So You would rather it uses 100%???. Probably all a quad core needs. Problem?
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 15
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #3

    I was assuming if it used 100% it would be encoding the video more quickly or is this incorrect?

    Sorry if I'm misunderstanding you.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 15
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #4

    Maybe that's how it is supposed to work then as I have just read this which was comparing a Core 2 Quad to an i7...

    The i7 was a solid 40% faster. The Core 2 Quad ran at 95% across all 4 Cores while the i7 was around 30% across all cores. The i7 runs at a lower percentage as this chips design has reduced latency on its instruction delivery. It can do more with lower clock speeds than the Core 2.

    Still don't understand why it won't go to it's maximum potential speed though.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 127
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
       #5

    Just a thought, is it possible that your encoding software is using acceleration from your GPU?
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 15
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
    Thread Starter
       #6

    Well it must be working properly as I managed to max out the processor when running this test

    Tech ARP - x264 HD Benchmark Ver. 3.18

    on the second pass so I guess it's just the way the software works.

    x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS


    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Results for x264.exe r1342
    --------------------------
    encoded 1442 frames, 92.97 fps, 3898.50 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 94.17 fps, 3899.02 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 93.01 fps, 3899.02 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 91.02 fps, 3898.50 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 36.73 fps, 3963.07 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 37.10 fps, 3956.59 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 36.82 fps, 3971.46 kb/s
    encoded 1442 frames, 36.73 fps, 3966.62 kb/s


    System Details
    --------------
    Name Intel Core i7 920
    product System Product Name
    Codename Bloomfield
    Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
    Specification PC3-12800
    Specification PC3-12800
    Specification PC3-12800
    Core Stepping D0
    Technology 45 nm
    Stock frequency 2666 MHz
    Core Speed 4000.0 MHz

    Northbridge Intel X58 rev. 12
    Southbridge Intel 82801JR (ICH10R) rev. 00

    CAS# latency (CL) 9.0
    RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD) 9
    RAS# Precharge (tRP) 9
    Cycle Time (tRAS) 28
    Command Rate (CR) 2T
    Command Rate 2T
    Command Rate 2T
    Command Rate 2T
    Memory Frequency 800.0 MHz (2:8)
    Memory Type DDR3
    Memory Size 6144 MBytes
    Channels Triple

    Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition (Build 7600)

    Number of processors 1
    Number of threads 8
    Number of threads 8 (max 16)
    L2 cache 4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
    Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T
    Package (platform ID) Socket 1366 LGA (0x1)

    Temperature 0 45°C (112°F) [0x2D] (SYSTIN)
    Temperature 1 55°C (130°F) [0x6D] (CPUTIN)
    Temperature 2 3°C (36°F) [0x5] (AUXTIN)
    Temperature 0 69°C (156°F) [0x1F] (Core #0)
    Temperature 1 66°C (150°F) [0x22] (Core #1)
    Temperature 2 61°C (141°F) [0x27] (Core #2)
    Temperature 3 62°C (143°F) [0x26] (Core #
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 12,364
    8 Pro x64
       #7

    giblet said:
    Well it must be working properly as I managed to max out the processor when running this test


    on the second pass so I guess it's just the way the software works.
    It is - For comparison, I use ConvertXtoDVD and it only utilises around 30% across 8 cores.

    If I reduce the amount of available cores to encode, the overall CPU usage increases.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 2,164
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
       #8

    It is possible that it is only using 30% due to the hard drives. It is processing as fast as the drives can read/write the data.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 7 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 7" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:39.
Find Us